How to solve this second order differential equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the second order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by ## \ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##, where p and q are constants. Participants explore various methods for tackling this equation, including analytical approaches and numerical solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest reducing the second order ODE to a first order equation by multiplying both sides by ## \dot \sigma ## and integrating.
  • Others clarify that the equation is a second order ordinary differential equation, not a partial differential equation.
  • One participant proposes using computational tools like Mathematica to check for solutions in terms of known functions, suggesting that if the software cannot solve it, a series expansion may be necessary.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of recognizing the highly nonlinear nature of the ODE and the potential for solutions involving special functions.
  • Some suggest starting with separation of variables and integrating once, although uncertainty remains about the feasibility of further integration.
  • One participant interprets the equation as a motion equation and discusses the implications of potential energy associated with the system.
  • Another participant provides a method to reduce the equation to first order and presents a general expression for further analysis, including integration steps and potential solutions involving radicals and hyperbolic functions.
  • A later reply discusses the integration process in detail, leading to an algebraic problem for solving for y.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the methods for solving the ODE, with no consensus on a definitive solution or approach. Some participants agree on the potential for using computational tools, while others emphasize manual methods and the complexity of the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the nonlinear characteristics of the ODE and the challenges in finding analytical solutions. There is mention of the dependence on initial conditions and the potential need for approximations.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Any idea how to solve this equation:

## \ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Or

## \frac{d^2 \sigma}{dt^2} - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Where p and q are constants.Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
This is of the form \ddot \sigma = f(\sigma), so you can reduce it to first order by multiplying both sides by \dot \sigma and integrating: <br /> \frac12 \left(\dot\sigma^2(t) - \dot\sigma^2(0)\right) = \int_{\sigma(0)}^{\sigma(t)} f(s)\,ds. I haven't checked whether the resulting ODE for \dot \sigma can be solved analytically.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
The equation is second order, all right, but it is not a partial differential equation, as you initially wrote in the thread title. It's a second order ordinary differential equation (ODE).
 
Last edited:
Safinaz said:
Any idea how to solve this equation:

## \ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Or

## \frac{d^2 \sigma}{dt^2} - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Where p and q are constants.Thanks.
Here's how things go in the era of AI of the 21st century: You "feed" this ODE to Mathematica on the Wolframalpha website. In a matter of seconds, you will see if it has a solution in terms of known elementary or special functions. If such a solution is shown by the software, then you can ask people how this solution is computed by the program. If the AI can't break it, neither can people, then a series-expansion is needed (i.e. an approximation for t very close to 0).
 
dextercioby said:
Here's how things go in the era of AI of the 21st century: You "feed" this ODE to Mathematica on the Wolframalpha website. In a matter of seconds, you will see if it has a solution in terms of known elementary or special functions. If such a solution is shown by the software, then you can ask people how this solution is computed by the program. If the AI can't break it, neither can people, then a series-expansion is needed (i.e. an approximation for t very close to 0).
No.
 
S.G. Janssens said:
No.
I am sorry, but if the OP has no "feeling" that his highly nonlinear ODE may be solved by special functions, he can't just pretend that AI did not exist, like in the time of Gradsheyn and Rytzhik doing complicated integrals by hand. You may think it is cheating, but I say this is only being being realistic.
 
You can start with separation of variables and integrating one time ... It seems that the first integration will work, for the second I don't know, you must to try ...
Ssnow
 
We can interpret it as equation of motion
\ddot{x}=-\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}
where
U=-pe^x-\frac{q}{2}e^{2x}
We can investigate shape of the potential energy including
U(-\infty)=0, |U(+\infty)|=\infty
Say p,q>0
total energy E<0 would tell the region where the particle cannot go. For E>0 the particle would go infinite.
 
Last edited:
(* edited: noticed DE in p easily solved by separation of variables *)

I suggest start by writing it as
$$
y''-a e^y-b e^{2y}=0
$$
Then let ##y'=p## as the standard notation. Then ##y''=p\frac{dp}{dy}## leaving
$$
p\frac{dp}{dy}-a e^y-b e^{2 y}=0
$$
or
$$
pdp=(ae^y+be^{2y})dy
$$
It's at least reduced to first-order and can be solved by integrating:
$$
p_1(y)=-\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
$$
p_2(y)=\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
Then need to solve:

$$
y'=-\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
$$
y'=\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
which Mathematical gives solutions in terms of radicals, tanh, and log expressions:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
  • #10
aheight said:
would be interesting to figure out how these are the solutions.
As said in post #8 these solutions come from energy conservation law. c_1 is total energy for m=1.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I'd like to continue a bit to solve this somewhat manually. We have the general expression:
$$
\frac{dy}{dx}=\sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2y}+c}
$$
Separating variables again and integrating (I did the integration with Mathematica):
$$
\begin{align*}
\int\frac{dy}{\sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2y}+c}}&=x+c_2 \\
-\frac{\tanh ^{-1}\left(\frac{a e^y+2 c}{2 \sqrt{c} \sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2 y}+c}}\right)}{\sqrt{c}}&=x+c_2 \\
\frac{a e^y+2 c}{2 \sqrt{c} \sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2 y}+c}}&=\tanh(\sqrt{c}(x+c_2))
\end{align*}
$$
So basically now reduced to an algebraic problem solving for y in the expression:
$$
ae^y+2c=k\sqrt{ae^y+be^{2y}+c}
$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K