Undergrad How to solve this second order differential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by the equation \(\ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} = 0\), where \(p\) and \(q\) are constants. Participants suggest using Mathematica on the WolframAlpha website to determine if an analytical solution exists. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reducing the ODE to a first-order equation through integration and separation of variables. The solutions can be expressed in terms of radicals, hyperbolic functions, and logarithmic expressions, highlighting the connection to energy conservation principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with integration techniques and separation of variables
  • Knowledge of Mathematica software for computational assistance
  • Basic concepts of potential energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for solving differential equations
  • Study the method of separation of variables in ODEs
  • Learn about energy conservation in the context of differential equations
  • Investigate special functions that may arise from nonlinear ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with nonlinear ordinary differential equations, as well as students seeking to enhance their problem-solving skills in applied mathematics.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Any idea how to solve this equation:

## \ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Or

## \frac{d^2 \sigma}{dt^2} - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Where p and q are constants.Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
This is of the form \ddot \sigma = f(\sigma), so you can reduce it to first order by multiplying both sides by \dot \sigma and integrating: <br /> \frac12 \left(\dot\sigma^2(t) - \dot\sigma^2(0)\right) = \int_{\sigma(0)}^{\sigma(t)} f(s)\,ds. I haven't checked whether the resulting ODE for \dot \sigma can be solved analytically.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
The equation is second order, all right, but it is not a partial differential equation, as you initially wrote in the thread title. It's a second order ordinary differential equation (ODE).
 
Last edited:
Safinaz said:
Any idea how to solve this equation:

## \ddot \sigma - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Or

## \frac{d^2 \sigma}{dt^2} - p e^\sigma - q e^{2\sigma} =0 ##

Where p and q are constants.Thanks.
Here's how things go in the era of AI of the 21st century: You "feed" this ODE to Mathematica on the Wolframalpha website. In a matter of seconds, you will see if it has a solution in terms of known elementary or special functions. If such a solution is shown by the software, then you can ask people how this solution is computed by the program. If the AI can't break it, neither can people, then a series-expansion is needed (i.e. an approximation for t very close to 0).
 
dextercioby said:
Here's how things go in the era of AI of the 21st century: You "feed" this ODE to Mathematica on the Wolframalpha website. In a matter of seconds, you will see if it has a solution in terms of known elementary or special functions. If such a solution is shown by the software, then you can ask people how this solution is computed by the program. If the AI can't break it, neither can people, then a series-expansion is needed (i.e. an approximation for t very close to 0).
No.
 
S.G. Janssens said:
No.
I am sorry, but if the OP has no "feeling" that his highly nonlinear ODE may be solved by special functions, he can't just pretend that AI did not exist, like in the time of Gradsheyn and Rytzhik doing complicated integrals by hand. You may think it is cheating, but I say this is only being being realistic.
 
You can start with separation of variables and integrating one time ... It seems that the first integration will work, for the second I don't know, you must to try ...
Ssnow
 
We can interpret it as equation of motion
\ddot{x}=-\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}
where
U=-pe^x-\frac{q}{2}e^{2x}
We can investigate shape of the potential energy including
U(-\infty)=0, |U(+\infty)|=\infty
Say p,q>0
total energy E<0 would tell the region where the particle cannot go. For E>0 the particle would go infinite.
 
Last edited:
(* edited: noticed DE in p easily solved by separation of variables *)

I suggest start by writing it as
$$
y''-a e^y-b e^{2y}=0
$$
Then let ##y'=p## as the standard notation. Then ##y''=p\frac{dp}{dy}## leaving
$$
p\frac{dp}{dy}-a e^y-b e^{2 y}=0
$$
or
$$
pdp=(ae^y+be^{2y})dy
$$
It's at least reduced to first-order and can be solved by integrating:
$$
p_1(y)=-\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
$$
p_2(y)=\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
Then need to solve:

$$
y'=-\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
$$
y'=\sqrt{2 a e^y+b e^{2 y}+2 c_1}
$$
which Mathematical gives solutions in terms of radicals, tanh, and log expressions:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #10
aheight said:
would be interesting to figure out how these are the solutions.
As said in post #8 these solutions come from energy conservation law. c_1 is total energy for m=1.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I'd like to continue a bit to solve this somewhat manually. We have the general expression:
$$
\frac{dy}{dx}=\sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2y}+c}
$$
Separating variables again and integrating (I did the integration with Mathematica):
$$
\begin{align*}
\int\frac{dy}{\sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2y}+c}}&=x+c_2 \\
-\frac{\tanh ^{-1}\left(\frac{a e^y+2 c}{2 \sqrt{c} \sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2 y}+c}}\right)}{\sqrt{c}}&=x+c_2 \\
\frac{a e^y+2 c}{2 \sqrt{c} \sqrt{a e^y+b e^{2 y}+c}}&=\tanh(\sqrt{c}(x+c_2))
\end{align*}
$$
So basically now reduced to an algebraic problem solving for y in the expression:
$$
ae^y+2c=k\sqrt{ae^y+be^{2y}+c}
$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K