How to Specify Replacement Spur Gears for Worn-Out Parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ouabache
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the process of specifying replacement spur gears for worn-out parts, particularly in the context of an office paper shredder. Participants explore terminology, measurement criteria, material considerations, and potential sources for replacement parts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to determine equivalent replacement gears, mentioning the importance of various gear specifications such as diametric pitch, pressure angle, and face width.
  • Another participant doubts the standardization of gears and suggests that detailed drawings are often necessary due to the complexity of gear design.
  • A participant highlights the need for minimum criteria to order replacement parts, including gear diameter, number of teeth, and shape of teeth.
  • Some participants recommend specific resources for gear specifications, such as QTC and WM Berg, and mention the importance of matching the pressure angle in mating gears.
  • One participant emphasizes that the tooth form should always be involute and discusses the importance of measuring the worn gears to determine original specifications.
  • There is a mention of the potential obsolescence of certain pressure angles and the need for modern standards.
  • Another participant questions the status of the shredder manufacturer, suggesting they may no longer be in business.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of specific measurements and criteria for selecting replacement gears, but there is no consensus on the standardization of gears or the best approach to finding exact replacements. Multiple competing views on material choice and design considerations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that tolerances and specific design features may vary significantly, which could affect the compatibility of replacement gears. There is also uncertainty regarding the standards for metric gears compared to those for older machines.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals involved in mechanical design, repair of machinery, or those seeking to understand gear specifications and replacement processes.

Ouabache
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
10
This is outside of my area of expertise, which is why I making this post.

I'd like to replace a couple of spur gears that have worn out, but am not familiar with descriptive terminology. How may I determine what gears to order? I want to make sure I order equivalent parts. The originals are plastic, I am inclined to replace them with metal (for longevity). Is that wise? Or is choice of material, an important design consideration. (example: Is there sufficient power to turn new metal gears versus plastic?)

Here are a few terms I ran across in the parts catalogs: diametric pitch, pressure angle, face width, bore diam., pitch diameter, hub projection, hub diameter, outside diam, face width. I assume I need to measure these on my failed parts. How do you recommend I go about this? (i have already made a web search for gear parts nomenclature)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I doubt you're going to find an exact replacement unless you get the part number and go straight to the source. I'm not sure, but I doubt gears are close to being as standardized as other machine parts (such as screws). There's just too many design variables to consider.

I worked on gearboxes in my last job. Granted, they were aerospace gearboxes, but pretty much every single thing with gear teeth had it's own separate, detailed drawings. The actual gear data was given in a chart, but it's whatever the gears were attached to that required its own drawings. Nevertheless, the gear data was quite complicated. It included the terms you mentioned, plus many others. Root diameter, TIF (true involute form), number of teeth (obviously), tooth thickness/ space width, over/under pin measurements, and who knows what else. Then there'd be other geometric features such as chamfers or radii at the tips and roots, and all these terms had their tolerances which, if they were overstepped, could very well result in adverse mating conditions.

Again, I don't know if the part you're looking for is standardized, but if it is then you'll probably just need to figure out who/ how made it, and see if they make the same thing out of metal.
 
Perhaps the tolerances on the device I am working on is forgiving. This gear is part of the mechanism inside an office paper shredder. The original failed part is plastic, (broken teeth). For a practical solution, what are the minimum criteria needed to order replacement parts? (for example: gear diameter, number of teeth, shape of teeth) ?
 
Ouabache said:
Perhaps the tolerances on the device I am working on is forgiving. This gear is part of the mechanism inside an office paper shredder. The original failed part is plastic, (broken teeth). For a practical solution, what are the minimum criteria needed to order replacement parts? (for example: gear diameter, number of teeth, shape of teeth) ?

i can say from the back of my head that you will need at least 3 things: module, # of teeth and a diameter, which the name i do not know in english but looking at a picture on wikipedia its either a pitch or base diameter, one of those 2.
 
QTC has a very good online tech library that may help you figure out what you need.
WM Berg is another good source.
http://www.qtcgears.com/
http://www.wmberg.com/
 
Thanks for your suggestions! With you're help, I'm getting better at
describing these gears.
 
Boston Gear has a gear catalog in their "literature" that has a section on specifying gears that explains a lot of this. The pressure angle is very important (must match in mating gears). Fortunately that appears standardized as 20, 25, or 14.5 degrees in older machines. I don't know about metric gears, they could be completely different standards?

See also Shigley Mechanical Engineering Design
 
Last edited:
Is the shredder manufacturer no longer in business?
 
Sorry for the necropost. They might be out of business by now.
 
  • #10
spur gear application and documentation

If you need a free application to create spur gears and you need some documentation regarding nomenclature, visit www.me-bac.com.

B.R.
 
  • #11
Ya got to check this out for spur gears

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
gmax137 said:
Boston Gear has a gear catalog in their "literature" that has a section on specifying gears that explains a lot of this. The pressure angle is very important (must match in mating gears). Fortunately that appears standardized as 20, 25, or 14.5 degrees in older machines. I don't know about metric gears, they could be completely different standards?

See also Shigley Mechanical Engineering Design

Don't make this any more difficult than it has to be.

The tooth form will always be an involute; don't even think about using any other form.

14.5 degree pressure angles are long since obsolete. Modern gears are always 20 or 25 deg pressure angle.

As to what you need (assuming that this is a mating pair that is worn out) ...
1. The center to center distances must match the originals (this is the sum of the actual pitch radii)
2. The ratio of the pitch radii must agree with the ratio of the tooth numbers (to get the correct ratio)
3. Bore diameters must suit the shaft diameters
4. Face width must be adequate for the loads (if going from plastic to steel this should be easy; the other way could be difficult)
These are the essentials.

If possible, I would measure the worn out gears to try to determine the original spec. The easy measurement is over the addendum, and assuming they are standard gears, you can work back to the pitch diameter from there. The teeth are easy to count, so that is not a problem either.

After you select a pair of gears that appear to work, use their specs to check strength, contact ratio (should be > 2, if possible) and if everything is OK, order them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K