Why Does My Calculator Show an Error with Tanh of a Complex Number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trustnoone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Casio fx100ms calculator does not support hyperbolic tangent (tanh) calculations for complex numbers, leading to a math error when users attempt to compute tanh(z) directly. The correct definition for tanh(z) is given by tanh(z) = sinh(z) / cosh(z) = (e^z - e^(-z)) / (e^z + e^(-z)). For complex number calculations, users are advised to utilize online tools such as Wolfram Alpha or Google Calculator, which can handle these computations accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic functions (sinh, cosh, tanh)
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of exponential functions
  • Experience using online calculation tools like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of hyperbolic functions in complex analysis
  • Learn how to use Wolfram Alpha for complex number calculations
  • Explore advanced calculators that support complex number functions, such as the TI-89
  • Study the derivation and applications of tanh(z) in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in mathematics, educators teaching complex analysis, and anyone interested in the limitations of standard calculators for complex number computations.

trustnoone
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
As the title shows, I want to do they hyperbolic tan of a complex number, using my calculator (casio fx100ms) but I keep getting a maths error, whether I do it using the tanh function or if I try the

(1-e^(-2x))/(1+e^(-2x))


Any help would be awesome. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
I think your calculator manual says that the calculator doesn't support the complex number coefficient mode for hyperbolic sinh, cosh, tanh and other select functions.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...ttcjO3x9gBVXwPw&bvm=bv.69411363,d.cWc&cad=rja

Nooooo :(, thanks for looking into it mate, I thought it was just something I was doing wrong. Is there any way I can do it normally? like any way I can do it say like the hard way?
 
Use google, in the search box enter tanh(5i) as an example and google calculator will show the answer - 3.38051501 i
 
Dang calculators only support real numbers! (Well, most of 'em anyways)

Tanh(z) can be evaluated by using the definition of the tanh function with complex argument z,

tanh(z) = sinh(z) / cosh(z) = \frac{e^{z}-e^{-z}}{e^z+e^{-z}}

which is not as easy to calculate as it looks. See:

http://www.uni-graz.at/imawww/vqm/pages/complex/12_tanh.html

You can always use Wolfram Alpha to calculate a tanh(z) for a specific value of z
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
SteamKing said:
Dang calculators only support real numbers! (Well, most of 'em anyways)

Tanh(z) can be evaluated by using the definition of the tanh function with complex argument z,

tanh(z) = sinh(z) / cosh(z) = \frac{e^{z}-e^{-z}}{e^z+e^{-z}}

which is not as easy to calculate as it looks. See:

http://www.uni-graz.at/imawww/vqm/pages/complex/12_tanh.html

You can always use Wolfram Alpha to calculate a tanh(z) for a specific value of z

Thanks mate, its actually on my formula sheet on my exam I got to take tomorrow, but if that's the case I really don't think I will be able to use it with only my calculator itself. Cheers though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps you should ask your teacher about it before the exam. You might need a better calculator TI-83 ? but not sure if it has the same limit or not.

CORRECTION:

http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/tanh

TI caclculator doesn't support complex numbers with tanh either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
41K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K