How to visualize 2-form or exterior product?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lriuui0x0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on visualizing 2-forms, specifically the exterior product df ∧ dg, through the intersection of contour lines defined by functions f and g. It emphasizes that the oriented area defined by these differential forms can be represented by a grid of contour lines, where each grid cell corresponds to an area of one. The conversation also highlights the geometric interpretation of differential forms as smooth sections of cotangent bundles, providing both geometric and algebraic perspectives on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their properties
  • Familiarity with contour lines and their significance in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of exterior products in differential geometry
  • Basic concepts of cotangent bundles and their geometric interpretations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of differential forms in cotangent bundles
  • Research the algebraic properties of exterior products in differential geometry
  • Learn about visualizing higher-dimensional forms using contour lines
  • Investigate resources on visualizing tensors and their applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential geometry, particularly those interested in the visualization of differential forms and their applications in various fields.

lriuui0x0
Messages
101
Reaction score
25
We can visualize 1-form by contour lines, since a 1-form / gradient sort of represents how fast the function changes. I wonder whether we can visualize 2-form df ^ dg by intersection of two sets of contour lines for f and g, or maybe something of a similar nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lriuui0x0 said:
We can visualize 1-form by contour lines, since a 1-form / gradient sort of represents how fast the function changes. I wonder whether we can visualize 2-form df ^ dg by intersection of two sets of contour lines for f and g, or maybe something of a similar nature?
It's rather the (oriented) area defined by df and dg.
 
fresh_42 said:
It's rather the (oriented) area defined by df and dg.
Let's say we have a grid of contour lines defined by df and dg, consecutive contour lines have their function values changed by one. Then does each grid cell correspond to area one?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
Let's say we have a grid of contour lines defined by df and dg, consecutive contour lines have their function values changed by one. Then does each grid cell correspond to area one?
Such visualizations have their limits. It is better in this context to consider ##df## and ##dg## as coordinate vectors rather than infinitesimals.

##a_1 \wedge a_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge a_n## is the oriented volume spanned by the vectors ##a_k.## We have ##n=2## here, and ##a_k## are differential ##1-##forms, covectors.

Of course, you can always consider differential forms as smooth sections of cotangent bundles. This is per se a geometric definition, even if a more sophisticated one, but nevertheless, geometric.

Here is a more algebraic description:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/pantheon-derivatives-part-iii/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K