MHB How to workout the exponential curve using x and y values and without excel

masterims
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I have searched for hours but cannot figure this out. I need to find the equation for an exponential curve but I only have the x and y values. Is there a way to do this without using excel?

I tried to follow this on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta4MZS7w2VA but the equation I got for the data below was different to what excel produces.

x......y
78.46......99.572
90.12......99.56
107.61......99.545
101.78......99.531
119.27......99.514
101.78......99.5
113.44......99.484
107.61......9.469

Thank you,
Imran
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
masterims said:
Hi All,

I have searched for hours but cannot figure this out. I need to find the equation for an exponential curve but I only have the x and y values. Is there a way to do this without using excel?

I tried to follow this on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta4MZS7w2VA but the equation I got for the data below was different to what excel produces.

x......y
78.46......99.572
90.12......99.56
107.61......99.545
101.78......99.531
119.27......99.514
101.78......99.5
113.44......99.484
107.61......9.469

Thank you,
Imran

Hi masterims! Welcome to MHB! :)

Yes, there are other ways than to use Excel.
Actually, you can use Excel in other ways to find an exponential equation.

But before we go there, let's start with your data points.
From visual inspection, I can see that your x-data is distributed with a reasonable range.
However, your y-data is nearly constant (with 1 exception).
So it doesn't seem to match an exponential curve at all.

Moreover, you have a far outlier in your last data point.
Whatever you do, this will have a disastrous effect on any exponential curve match.
 
masterims said:
Hi All,

I have searched for hours but cannot figure this out. I need to find the equation for an exponential curve but I only have the x and y values. Is there a way to do this without using excel?

I tried to follow this on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta4MZS7w2VA but the equation I got for the data below was different to what excel produces.

x......y
78.46......99.572
90.12......99.56
107.61......99.545
101.78......99.531
119.27......99.514
101.78......99.5
113.44......99.484
107.61......9.469

Thank you,
Imran
I'm going to assume that the y value for the x = 107.61 data point is a typo (y = 99.459?), not an outlier. However the exponential fit and the linear fit to the data are both horrible: I get r^2 = 0.5 (or so) for both fits. So it doesn't matter what method you use...I can't think of a way to do it without Excel, unless you wish to do some time consuming calculator work. But seeing as you are going to get lousy results, I'd say talk to your instructor first.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top