How was the value of the permittivity of free space determined?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The permittivity of free space, ε0, was historically determined through experimental setups measuring electrostatic forces, but its current definition is based on the speed of light (c) and the magnetic permeability of free space (μ0). As of now, ε0 is defined in relation to these constants, and upcoming changes in SI units may redefine it as an experimentally measured quantity linked to the fine structure constant. The historical context reveals that the measurement methods and definitions have evolved significantly over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with the speed of light (c) and magnetic permeability (μ0)
  • Knowledge of the fine structure constant and its significance
  • Basic grasp of SI unit definitions and their historical changes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical methods used to measure electrostatic forces
  • Study the implications of the fine structure constant on physical constants
  • Explore the upcoming changes in SI unit definitions and their impact on permittivity
  • Learn about the experimental setups for measuring vacuum permittivity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students interested in electromagnetism and the historical evolution of physical constants.

Steven_Scott
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The permittivity of free space, ε0, is usually given without any derivation or historical context as to how it was experimentally determined.

Could you explain to me how the value of ε0 was first determined experimentally or provide a resource that gives such a derivation?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Did you try Google / Wikipedia?
 
Worth noting: It was only measured historically when the definition of the meter was different than it is today. Today, it is directly defined through the definition of ##c## and ##\mu_0##.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity

However, if you want to do it the ”old way” you can create a setup where you can determine electrostatic forces.
 
Orodruin said:
Worth noting: It was only measured historically when the definition of the meter was different than it is today. Today, it is directly defined through the definition of ##c## and ##\mu_0##.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity

However, if you want to do it the ”old way” you can create a setup where you can determine electrostatic forces.
Interestingly, if the SI units are changed at the next meeting as expected then the permittivity of free space will again be an experimentally measured quantity. It will be related to the fine structure constant.
 
Dale said:
Interestingly, if the SI units are changed at the next meeting as expected then the permittivity of free space will again be an experimentally measured quantity. It will be related to the fine structure constant.
Yes, the underlying reason being that ##\mu_0## no longer will set the definition of the Ampere, but the Ampere will instead be defined as a number of elementary charges per second.
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, the underlying reason being that \mu_0 no longer will set the definition of the Ampere,

So π (or at least 4π x 107) becomes a measured quantity? :confused:
 
Vanadium 50 said:
So π (or at least 4π x 107) becomes a measured quantity? :confused:
The definition will change to ##\mu_0=\frac{2h\alpha}{ce^2}##. All of those will be exact except for the fine structure constant.
 
I've a vague recollection of a College or Uni lab with a 'vacuum capacitor', plate edge effects mitigated by guard rings and other arcane topology.
Sadly, it was more an exercise in error bars than a definitive determination...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K