Graduate How wise/unwise would it be to attempt to create a strangelet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter greswd
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the potential creation of strangelets and the associated risks, including the hypothetical scenario where strange matter could convert ordinary matter, leading to catastrophic outcomes. While the likelihood of producing strangelets in particle accelerators is considered extremely low, the idea of intentionally increasing these odds raises concerns about safety. Some argue that if future advancements allow for better understanding of strange matter, the risks may be manageable, especially if experiments are conducted far from Earth. The conversation also touches on the notion that any potential hazards should be contained within the solar system to avoid unintended consequences. Overall, the debate reflects a tension between scientific exploration and the precautionary principle regarding potentially dangerous phenomena.
greswd
Messages
764
Reaction score
20
Some hypothetical predictions of the strange matter hypothesis are that strangelets could possibly convert ordinary matter to strange matter in a critical reaction, "grey-goo"-like scenario.

Now, the odds of strangelets being created in particle accelerators are slim to none.

However, if we could create a device that would radically increase the odds, for the express purpose of creating strangelets, would it be unwise to do so, given the hypothesis of untold catastrophe?

Or should particle physicists strive to push the boundaries?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inference that strangelet production could lead to a catastrophe seems strange. Where did you get that idea?
 
There is no natural process that can produce them with any relevant frequency, if at all. If we have reason to expect that any future process might increase the odds over all natural processes we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.
 
  • Wow
Likes berkeman
mfb said:
we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.

so a precaution in case we could annihilate the earth?
 
By the time we might have the chance to create such a thing we'll probably understand its properties better.
 
It can't be too unwise, since physicists have been trying to do so for at least a half century in the form of searches for an H dibaryon resonance. Obviously, that has not created a catastrophe. If strange matter exists, it most likely would have to be bound by gravity in something like a strange star, which would not be very doable here on earth.
 
mfb said:
There is no natural process that can produce them with any relevant frequency, if at all. If we have reason to expect that any future process might increase the odds over all natural processes we might want to do that on a trajectory that leaves the Solar System.
The little green men out there might take a dim view of that.
 
Space is big. Something that leaves the solar system is not expected to hit anything in the next few billion years, and might never hit anything until the heat death of the universe.
 
  • #10
mfb said:
Space is big. Something that leaves the solar system is not expected to hit anything in the next few billion years, and might never hit anything until the heat death of the universe.
Fair enough, but as far as I know, the LGM[1] would like us to keep our space pollution, especially any potentially hazardous anomaly, such as a strangelet, a micro black hole, or a magnetic monopole, as local as may be possible. :oldwink:

[1] LGM = Little Green Men
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K