Undergrad How would a 4th Dimensional Object Move?

Click For Summary
A tesseract, as a 4D object, does not move in the traditional sense but exists as a fixed figure in 4D space, similar to how a triangle is fixed on a 2D plane. In the context of spacetime, movement is represented by world lines, which indicate relative velocity without actual motion. While some discussions suggest a form of "movement" along these world lines, it is more about defining hyper-velocity in relation to particle behavior. This concept may find applications in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding phenomena like wave-particle duality. Ultimately, the nature of 4D objects and their interaction with spacetime challenges conventional notions of movement.
Blop
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I want to know how a 4D object, (specifically a tesseract) would move in the space of t, not x, y or z.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't. A 4D object is a fixed figure in a 4D space. Just like a given triangle is a fixed figure on a 2D sheet of paper.
 
A path in 4D, and I'm assuming you're referring to Spacetime not a Euclidean space, is a world line. So it doesn't move it exists. Some authors do refer to things moving along a world line but I think this is for practicality.

Cheers
 
Good point, cosmik debris. The object, continuum and "motion" if not given, will be presumed to be particles (or composites) from the Standard Model, 4D of spacetime (3+1) and velocity in distance/time respectively. Worldlines in a Minkowski spacetime diagram don't themselves move but they do indicate relative velocity as the inverse of slope in that reference frame.

One might construe the "movement" of a worldline but it would have to be defined as some kind of hyper-velocity*. I can imagine a use for such a construct in quantum mechanics, as it relates to phenomena where a single particle seems to pass through two slits at once. That is, to ascribe a wave nature to a particle.

*The term "hypervelocity" is however, already in use to indicate those > 3,000 m/sec.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K