How would Cherenkov radiation play into GR, the dolphins' version?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a hypothetical scenario where dolphins, perceiving the universe as a vast ocean, develop their own version of general relativity. It questions how their understanding would differ from humans, particularly in light of the fact that certain particles can radiate faster than light in water. The conversation suggests that while their theory might parallel the human version, the constant "c" would represent the maximum speed of radiation in water rather than in a vacuum. Additionally, it raises questions about the dolphins' technological capabilities, specifically whether they could construct a Michelson interferometer but lack the means to create a vacuum chamber for testing, highlighting the limitations of their scientific advancements in this ocean-centric context.
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
124
If dolphins thought the universe was just a really big ocean, and if they had come up with the theory of general relativity, how would the fact that certain particles radiate faster than light through water shape their version of the theory? Would it be essentially the same with the human version, except "c" would denote the speed of the fastest measured (or the fastest possible) radiation in water?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EnumaElish said:
If dolphins thought the universe was just a really big ocean, and if they had come up with the theory of general relativity, how would the fact that certain particles radiate faster than light through water shape their version of the theory? Would it be essentially the same with the human version, except "c" would denote the speed of the fastest measured (or the fastest possible) radiation in water?
So are these hypothetical dolphins capable of building a Michelson interferometer but incapable of building a vacuum chamber in which to test it?
 
russ_watters said:
So are these hypothetical dolphins capable of building a Michelson interferometer but incapable of building a vacuum chamber in which to test it?

That's the premise, "in a seashell." I am not going to attempt to justify it.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top