How would one prove that algebraic topology can never have a non self-

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the question of proving that algebraic topology cannot have a non self-contradictory set of abelian groups. The initial query was unclear and lacked context, leading to confusion among participants. It was clarified that abelian groups are defined by their commutative operations, but the original poster's understanding of topology was limited. Ultimately, the consensus is that without further clarification, the question lacks substance and is deemed nonsensical.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic topology concepts
  • Knowledge of abelian group properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical proof techniques
  • Basic comprehension of group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of abelian groups in group theory
  • Study foundational concepts in algebraic topology
  • Learn about mathematical proof structures and techniques
  • Explore the relationship between algebraic structures and topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying algebraic topology and group theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify foundational concepts in these areas.

Amsingh123
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
contradictory set of abelian groups.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas about what? You have to provide some context here!
 
What other context are you looking for?
 
Well your thread title only says "How would one prove that algebraic topology can never have a non self-" and then stops, while the body of your posts makes some mumblings about a TV show and proof, but never mentions what result you have in mind. So pretty much ANY indication about what question you're really asking would be nice.
 
S*** sorry it must've gotten cut off. The title was supposed to read, "How would one prove that algebraic topology can never have a non self-contradictory set of abelian groups."
 
Alright this is a step in the right direction. What do you mean self-contradictory set of abelian groups though?
 
Well that's the thing. I heard it and I thought that I was complete nonsense because abelian groups are just groups in which the operations are commutative. I don't have a great understanding of topology since I'm only 15, so I thought that my conclusion that it was just bs was due to my lack of understanding. But, I thought that maybe one could make sense out of it on this forum if anywhere.
 
Well without further clarification, the question is nonsense as it stands. So hopefully that gives you some peace of mind.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Homemorphism in quotient topology
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Graduate What Topological Vector Spaces have an uncountable Schauder basis?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Question about existence of path-lifting property
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
High School Why Is the Trick for Open Sets in Quotient Topology Valid?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Graduate Algebraic topology applied to Neuroscience
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
High School Algebraic Topology in the tv show The Big Bang Theory
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
21K
Undergrad Interior and closure in non-Euclidean topology
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad A beginner’s thoughts on rotation number -- Resource suggestion request
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Graduate How many topologies exist on 4 points? Any nomenclature?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Undergrad On the topological proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K