- #1
Edward Solomo
- 72
- 1
If virtual particles were prevented from annihilating fractions of a second before the Big Rip itself is actually achieved, wouldn't the universe be flooded with real particles creating an incredible amount of mass?
1) This idea is incorrect
2) The idea is correct and it temporarily delays the Big Rip and continuously delays future Big Rips, thus preventing the Big Rip from ever reaching completion, leading to an infinite number of failed successive attempts to complete the Big Rip.
3) The idea is correct and causes such an incredible amount of matter to be created that the universe assumes an extremely high positive curvature and collapses to a point before the Big Rip diverges all distances to infinity.
4) Virtual Particles aren't real (in any sense) so this scenario is utterly retarded (quoted from below by a PF mentor).
1) This idea is incorrect
2) The idea is correct and it temporarily delays the Big Rip and continuously delays future Big Rips, thus preventing the Big Rip from ever reaching completion, leading to an infinite number of failed successive attempts to complete the Big Rip.
3) The idea is correct and causes such an incredible amount of matter to be created that the universe assumes an extremely high positive curvature and collapses to a point before the Big Rip diverges all distances to infinity.
4) Virtual Particles aren't real (in any sense) so this scenario is utterly retarded (quoted from below by a PF mentor).
Vanadium 50 said:Virtual particles are not real.
Asking where they come from is like asking where the tooth fairy comes from. They are a clever and useful mathematical trick (like image charges, if you've ever used method of images), but they are not real. It is unfortunate that the authors of so many popularizations treat them as if they are real, which leaves it to PF to clean up the mess they made.
Kexue's viewpoint is not the standard one, and I fear it is muddying the waters rather than clarifying everything. As he points out, there's already a thread on his views, so let's not derail this any further.
Last edited: