MHB HSO4^-1 as Arrhenius & Bronsted-Lowry Acid/Base

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arrhenius
AI Thread Summary
HSO4^-1 acts as an Arrhenius acid by dissociating in water to produce hydrogen ions, represented by the equation HSO4^- + H2O → SO4^2- + H3O+. As a Brønsted-Lowry base, it accepts a proton, shown by the equation HSO4^- + H+ → H2SO4. Both behaviors illustrate the dual role of HSO4^-1 in acid-base chemistry. This demonstrates its versatility in different acid-base theories. Understanding these reactions is essential for grasping the properties of HSO4^-1 in aqueous solutions.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
write down 2 equations to show how the HSO4^-1 ion can behave as a arrhenius acid and bronsted lowry base

i know if its a arrhenius acid it dissociates in water to produce hydrogen ions

so HSO4^-1 +h20 goes to SO4^-2 and the hydronium ion. is this right? i don't know how to show if its a bronsted lowry base
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
write down 2 equations to show how the HSO4^-1 ion can behave as a arrhenius acid and bronsted lowry base

i know if its a arrhenius acid it dissociates in water to produce hydrogen ions

so HSO4^-1 +h20 goes to SO4^-2 and the hydronium ion. is this right? i don't know how to show if its a bronsted lowry base

Hi markosheehan,

Behavior as an Arrhenius acid means it donates an $H^+$ ion to $H_2O$.
So indeed:
$$HSO_4^{-}(aq) \to SO_4^{2-}(aq) + H^+(aq)$$

Behavior as a Brønsted–Lowry base means it accepts an $H^+$ ion.
So:
$$HSO_4^{-} + H^+ \to H_2SO_4$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top