Hubble Parameter as function of time in universe models

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Hubble parameter (H) as a function of time within various cosmological models, specifically the L-CDM model and scenarios with different values of Lambda (Λ) and curvature (k). Users explore the use of the calculator available at jorrie.epizy.com to generate graphs for Λ=0 with varying k values. The conversation highlights the challenges of simulating recollapse scenarios and the limitations of the Lightcone8 tool when adjusting parameters like Omega (Ω) and Lambda (Λ). Participants share insights on plotting H against time using parametric expressions derived from Ryden's work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the L-CDM cosmological model
  • Familiarity with the Hubble parameter and its significance
  • Knowledge of cosmological parameters such as Omega (Ω) and Lambda (Λ)
  • Basic skills in using spreadsheet software for data visualization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of varying Omega (Ω) values in cosmological models
  • Explore the use of Ryden's parametric expressions for scale factor and cosmological time
  • Learn how to effectively use the calculator at jorrie.epizy.com for different cosmological scenarios
  • Investigate the behavior of the Hubble parameter in non-standard cosmological models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of the universe, particularly those studying the implications of different cosmological parameters on the evolution of the universe.

timmdeeg
Gold Member
Messages
1,578
Reaction score
364
This graph shows ##H## as a function of time related to the L-CDM model. Do we (@Jorrie) have similar graphs e.g. for ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=-1## critical, ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=0## open, ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=+1## closed?

That would be great, thanks in advance.

1668953461789.png
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Not precisely, but you can get close enough for all practical purposes by playing around with the input parameters and output options. E.g. ##\Lambda = 0.0000001##, set the output scaling to Normalized, select Chart and set hor and vert scales appropriately:
1669026724844.png

For Open and Closed cases, you play around with ##\Omega##. I have used the http://jorrie.epizy.com/docs/index.html?i=1 version, which has more liberal range limits than the approved Github version.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: timmdeeg
Ah, great, thanks for your advise!

One question, how can I show only one of these curves?
1669049449361.png
 
Last edited:
Just go to 'Column definition and selection'. I usually click 'none' and then select the two or three that I need. The default selections are just to give an idea of how it works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timmdeeg
Got it, thanks.
 
@Jorrie is there a way for the calculator to show recollapse? I can't seem to get there no matter how I fiddle with the parameters.
 
Lightcone8 does not allow for high Omega or very small Lambda, so I'm not sure that collapse can happen with these limitations. Any small Lambda may quickly become dominant again.
As a matter of fact it seems to crash if I set Lambda to 0.001 and Omega to 1.5. Will have to investigate that.

I recall that I have previously simulated a zero lambda situation with collapse on older, less accurate versions, but it will take some searching to find that.
 
timmdeeg said:
This graph shows ##H## as a function of time related to the L-CDM model. Do we (@Jorrie) have similar graphs e.g. for ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=-1## critical, ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=0## open, ##\Lambda=0##; ##k=+1## closed?

Bandersnatch said:
@Jorrie is there a way for the calculator to show recollapse?

In a closed matter-only (dust) FLRW univers, parametric expessions for the scale factor ##a## and cosmological time ##t## as functions of conformal time ##η## are (from Ryden)
$$\begin{align}
a\left(\eta\right) &= \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Omega_0}{\Omega_0 - 1} \left( 1 - \cos\eta \right) \\
t\left(\eta\right) &= \frac{1}{2H_0} \frac{\Omega_0}{\left( \Omega_0 - 1 \right)^{3/2}} \left( \eta - \sin\eta \right),
\end{align}$$
with ##0<\eta<2\pi##, and with ##\Omega_0>1## the present density relative to critical density.

The Hubble parameter is given by (with abuse of notation)
$$H\left(\eta\right) = \frac{1}{a} \frac{da}{dt} = \frac{1}{a}\frac{\frac{da}{d\eta}}{\frac{dt}{d\eta}} = \frac{2H_0 \left( \Omega_0 - 1 \right)^{3/2}}{\Omega_0} \frac{\sin\eta}{\left( 1 - \cos\eta \right)^2}.$$
Ii is easy to put ##\eta##, ##t\left(\eta\right)## , and ##H\left(\eta\right)## into three columns of a spreadsheet, and to use these to plot ##H\left(\eta\right)## versus ##t\left(\eta\right)## for ##0<\eta<2\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch and timmdeeg
George Jones said:
Ii is easy to
Yeah, but that requires ME to do some work, instead of somebody else ;)

For those interested, here's the graph for ##\Omega_0=1.5## and ##H_0=67.74##
1669666403563.png

And the spreadsheet

(make a copy if you want to change the parameters)

The behaviour tracks what Jorrie's calc outputs for early periods, so it's probably typed in alright.
The switcheroo towards collapse happens around 100 Gyrs for 1.5x critical density; for 2x density it's about 45 Gyrs; 800 Gyrs for 1.1 - which are the time scales I wanted to get a sense of.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: George Jones

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K