Hulse-Taylor pulsar and GR what if orbital velocities were higher?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adrian_m
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Orbital Pulsar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hulse-Taylor pulsar (PSR B1913+16) serves as a critical validation of General Relativity (GR) through its observed orbital decay, which aligns closely with GR predictions regarding energy loss via gravitational waves. Despite the lack of direct detection of gravitational waves by LIGO, the Advanced LIGO's sensitivity improvements in 2014 raised hopes for future confirmations. The discussion explores hypothetical scenarios where binary pulsars possess higher orbital velocities, questioning whether such conditions would lead to orbit maintenance or decay. Ultimately, it concludes that all orbits decay under GR, with no violations observed in other binary neutron star systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with binary pulsar dynamics
  • Knowledge of gravitational wave theory
  • Basic concepts of orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gravitational waves in General Relativity
  • Study the Advanced LIGO detection methods and their advancements
  • Explore other binary pulsar systems and their orbital characteristics
  • Investigate the differences between Newtonian and relativistic orbital mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students interested in gravitational wave research, binary pulsar dynamics, and the validation of General Relativity.

adrian_m
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
The Hulse-Taylor (PSR B1913+16) binary pulsar 'observed vs. predicted' orbit decay is one of the great validations of GR. The orbit decay over the recording period of 30+ years is very close to GR prediction as per predicted energy loss through gravitational waves.

Hulse-Taylor experiment is seen as a confirmation of the existence of gravitational waves, though none have yet been directly detected (LIGO has failed to do so, but the sensitivity of Advanced LIGO in 2014 may succeed, if the underlying theory and computations are correct. We're still waiting on that).

However, what would have happened if the two pulsars involved happened to have a 'slightly higher' orbital velocity around their CG than they do (as possibly may be the case for some other binary pulsars)? Would they have then maintained their existing orbits without decay or slowly spiraled outwards, and been seen as a refutation of the existence of gravitational waves? Have any other binary pulsar experiments confirmed or refuted this? Or is such a situation impossible?

[Bit of a naive question as I have very little understanding of the GR area that deals with gravitational waves, but hoping to get some inputs through this question.]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
adrian_m said:
The Hulse-Taylor (PSR B1913+16) binary pulsar 'observed vs. predicted' orbit decay is one of the great validations of GR. The orbit decay over the recording period of 30+ years is very close to GR prediction as per predicted energy loss through gravitational waves.

Hulse-Taylor experiment is seen as a confirmation of the existence of gravitational waves, though none have yet been directly detected (LIGO has failed to do so, but the sensitivity of Advanced LIGO in 2014 may succeed, if the underlying theory and computations are correct. We're still waiting on that).

However, what would have happened if the two pulsars involved happened to have a 'slightly higher' orbital velocity around their CG than they do (as possibly may be the case for some other binary pulsars)? Would they have then maintained their existing orbits without decay or slowly spiraled outwards, and been seen as a refutation of the existence of gravitational waves? Have any other binary pulsar experiments confirmed or refuted this? Or is such a situation impossible?

[Bit of a naive question as I have very little understanding of the GR area that deals with gravitational waves, but hoping to get some inputs through this question.]

All orbits decay, in principle, if GR is correct. An orbit that expanded (without some explanation like mass emission, or spin locking), would violate not only GR but Newtonian gravity. Not only have no violations been discovered, but several other binary neutron star systems have been discovered which match GR predictions precisely for different orbital and mass parameters.
 
PAllen said:
All orbits decay, in principle, if GR is correct. An orbit that expanded (without some explanation like mass emission, or spin locking), would violate not only GR but Newtonian gravity. Not only have no violations been discovered, but several other binary neutron star systems have been discovered which match GR predictions precisely for different orbital and mass parameters.

The question was not about the orbit decay predicted by GR. That can be assumed validated.

Let me clarify - the question was - what would we observe if we detected a pair of binary pulsars which have orbital velocities somewhere between 'Newtonian orbital velocity' and 'escape velocity'? What would we observe over a small period of 30-40 years? A high enough orbital velocity would show the binary pulsars spiraling outwards from each other, wouldn't it? (Correct me please if I am wrong in this basic concept!)
 
adrian_m said:
The question was not about the orbit decay predicted by GR. That can be assumed validated.

Let me clarify - the question was - what would we observe if we detected a pair of binary pulsars which have orbital velocities somewhere between 'Newtonian orbital velocity' and 'escape velocity'? What would we observe over a small period of 30-40 years? A high enough orbital velocity would show the binary pulsars spiraling outwards from each other, wouldn't it? (Correct me please if I am wrong in this basic concept!)

Orbits aren't necessarily circular. Closed orbits are usually elliptical.

If we observed a pair of massive objects which had an orbital velocity higher than that necessary for a circular orbit but less than that for escape, then by Newtonian theory we would expect to see them continue in elliptical orbits about their center of mass, where the current point in the orbit is closer together than the average for a whole orbit. By GR we would then expect to see that orbit modified in the long term by a slight decay (plus other effects such as perihelion precession).
 
Jonathan Scott said:
Orbits aren't necessarily circular. Closed orbits are usually elliptical.

If we observed a pair of massive objects which had an orbital velocity higher than that necessary for a circular orbit but less than that for escape, then by Newtonian theory we would expect to see them continue in elliptical orbits about their center of mass, where the current point in the orbit is closer together than the average for a whole orbit. By GR we would then expect to see that orbit modified in the long term by a slight decay (plus other effects such as perihelion precession).

Thanks for the response. This makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K