How does the Earth-Moon system gain energy despite tidal interactions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AntonL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy dynamics of the Earth-Moon system, particularly how energy is gained despite tidal interactions. Participants explore the implications of tidal forces, gravitational waves, and the conservation of angular momentum, with references to general relativity and empirical observations from binary pulsars.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that tidal interactions between the Earth and Moon result in the Earth's rotation slowing down while transferring energy to the Moon, which increases its orbital distance.
  • Others argue that while energy is dissipated as heat due to tidal forces, a fraction is transferred to the Moon, leading to an increase in its orbit.
  • There is a contention regarding the role of gravitational waves, with some stating that the energy lost through these waves is negligible compared to the energy gained from tidal acceleration.
  • Some participants express skepticism about energy conservation, suggesting that the Earth-Moon system appears to gain energy as the orbital distance increases, contradicting principles from general relativity.
  • One viewpoint emphasizes that gravitational waves can carry away orbital angular momentum, but tidal forces do not, necessitating an increase in distance for the system to reach a lower energy state.
  • A participant mentions that the energy transferred to the Moon from the Earth's rotation is significantly greater than any losses due to gravitational waves.
  • Several participants reference empirical data and theoretical frameworks, including the work of Hulse and Taylor on binary pulsars, to support their arguments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views remaining regarding the energy dynamics of the Earth-Moon system and the implications of tidal interactions versus gravitational wave effects.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the complexity of energy transfer mechanisms, including the assumptions about the negligible effects of gravitational waves and the varying interpretations of energy conservation in the context of tidal forces and angular momentum.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astrophysics, celestial mechanics, or anyone curious about the interactions between celestial bodies and the implications of energy transfer in orbital dynamics.

AntonL
Messages
521
Reaction score
0
Janus said:
It has to do with the tidal interaction between the Moon and Earth. As the Moon raises tides on the Earth it slows the Earth's rotation. In turn some of the Energy lost by the Earth is transferred to the Moon, pushing it into an higher orbit. The present of orbital increase is ~3.8cm per year.

http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html

The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.

This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
AntonL said:
The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.

This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?

The gravity wave energy lost by the Earth-Moon system is negligible. And the GR effects are tiny compared to the tidal forces. Binary pulsars can spiral together because they lose momentum as well as energy via the gravity waves. The Earth-Moon system loses energy via friction, but can't lose momentum that way, so conservation of orbital momentum means their separation has to increase as energy is lost.
 
qraal said:
The gravity wave energy lost by the Earth-Moon system is negligible. And the GR effects are tiny compared to the tidal forces. Binary pulsars can spiral together because they lose momentum as well as energy via the gravity waves. The Earth-Moon system loses energy via friction, but can't lose momentum that way, so conservation of orbital momentum means their separation has to increase as energy is lost.

Sorry I do not agree - energy is not being conserved but created in your argument.

Energy radiated by gravitational waves when orbit decreases from r_2 to r_1 is
\frac{1}{2} G M m \left(\frac{1}{r_1}-\frac{1}{r_2}\right)

So, again by this argument the Earth-Moon system is gaining energy as the orbital distance increases!
 
Last edited:
What's important is that gravitational waves have the ability to carry away orbital angular momentum as well as energy. The frictional losses induced by tidal torques will not carry away orbital angular momentum. Therefore, to be in a lower energy state, the distance between the Earth and Moon must actually increase because the system maintains the same angular momentum.
 
Isn't this all explained by tidal acceleration on the moon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration
The tidal bulge of the ocean is ahead of the moon slightly due to the rotation of the earth, resulting in the slowing of the Earth's rotation and an increase in the moons orbital velocity.
Any losses by gravitational waves are negligible compared to the amount gained from tidal acceleration.
Note that in the tidal acceleration, the energy transferred to the moon comes from the Earth's rotation, while in the gravitational waves the energy comes from the orbital velocity of the moon.
 
Last edited:
Drakkith said:
Isn't this all explained by tidal acceleration on the moon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration...

Thanks for that link, let me study it, learned something new today.

So, in one year the Earth is transferring about 1.8 x 1018 Joules to the Moon
and we generate around 7.2 x1019 Joules of energy in form of electricity in the same period.
 
Last edited:
AntonL said:
The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.
most but not all of the energy lost by the Earth is dissipated as heat, a fraction is transferred to the Moon via tidal torque.
This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?

Any energy losses through gravitational waves causing a tendency for the Moon's orbit to decrease is swamped by the energy transferred by the tidal torque. All losses due to gravitational radiation does is very slightly decrease the rate at which the Moon recedes.
 
Regarding the tidal torque phenomena that is something new I learned today
@Drakkith and @Janus thanks for pointing me in the right way
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K