How does the Earth-Moon system gain energy despite tidal interactions?

In summary, the tidal interaction between the Moon and Earth causes the Earth's rotation to slow down, leading to an increase in the Moon's orbital distance by about 3.8cm per year. NASA's conclusion that the orbital distance is increasing is in conflict with the theory of general relativity and the effects of gravity waves. However, the energy lost through these waves is negligible compared to the energy gained through tidal torque. This explains why the Earth-Moon system is gaining energy despite the dissipation of energy through friction.
  • #1
AntonL
521
0
Janus said:
It has to do with the tidal interaction between the Moon and Earth. As the Moon raises tides on the Earth it slows the Earth's rotation. In turn some of the Energy lost by the Earth is transferred to the Moon, pushing it into an higher orbit. The present of orbital increase is ~3.8cm per year.

http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html

The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.

This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
AntonL said:
The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.

This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?

The gravity wave energy lost by the Earth-Moon system is negligible. And the GR effects are tiny compared to the tidal forces. Binary pulsars can spiral together because they lose momentum as well as energy via the gravity waves. The Earth-Moon system loses energy via friction, but can't lose momentum that way, so conservation of orbital momentum means their separation has to increase as energy is lost.
 
  • #3
qraal said:
The gravity wave energy lost by the Earth-Moon system is negligible. And the GR effects are tiny compared to the tidal forces. Binary pulsars can spiral together because they lose momentum as well as energy via the gravity waves. The Earth-Moon system loses energy via friction, but can't lose momentum that way, so conservation of orbital momentum means their separation has to increase as energy is lost.

Sorry I do not agree - energy is not being conserved but created in your argument.

Energy radiated by gravitational waves when orbit decreases from [itex]r_2[/itex] to [itex]r_1[/itex] is
[tex] \frac{1}{2} G M m \left(\frac{1}{r_1}-\frac{1}{r_2}\right) [/tex]

So, again by this argument the Earth-Moon system is gaining energy as the orbital distance increases!
 
Last edited:
  • #4
What's important is that gravitational waves have the ability to carry away orbital angular momentum as well as energy. The frictional losses induced by tidal torques will not carry away orbital angular momentum. Therefore, to be in a lower energy state, the distance between the Earth and Moon must actually increase because the system maintains the same angular momentum.
 
  • #5
  • #6
Isn't this all explained by tidal acceleration on the moon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration
The tidal bulge of the ocean is ahead of the moon slightly due to the rotation of the earth, resulting in the slowing of the Earth's rotation and an increase in the moons orbital velocity.
Any losses by gravitational waves are negligible compared to the amount gained from tidal acceleration.
Note that in the tidal acceleration, the energy transferred to the moon comes from the Earth's rotation, while in the gravitational waves the energy comes from the orbital velocity of the moon.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Drakkith said:
Isn't this all explained by tidal acceleration on the moon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration...

Thanks for that link, let me study it, learned something new today.

So, in one year the Earth is transferring about 1.8 x 1018 Joules to the Moon
and we generate around 7.2 x1019 Joules of energy in form of electricity in the same period.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
AntonL said:
The quoted source does not make sense, the tides dissipate energy into heat (and electricity where man has harnessed the tides). This energy is taken from the Earth rotation and Earth-Moon orbit system leading NASA to conclude that the orbital distance increases.
most but not all of the energy lost by the Earth is dissipated as heat, a fraction is transferred to the Moon via tidal torque.
This conflicts with the teaching of GR and gravity waves. Gravity waves, if they exist, also remove energy from the orbiting body, however by GR the orbit distance decreases as demonstrated practically by Nobel laureates Russell A. Hulse and Joseph H. Taylor by analyzing the pulsar in the binary system PSR B1913+16.

So who is correct? Nasa or GR and Hulse &Taylor. I would say the later; so why is the Earth-Moon system gaining energy?

Any energy losses through gravitational waves causing a tendency for the Moon's orbit to decrease is swamped by the energy transferred by the tidal torque. All losses due to gravitational radiation does is very slightly decrease the rate at which the Moon recedes.
 
  • #9
Regarding the tidal torque phenomena that is something new I learned today
@Drakkith and @Janus thanks for pointing me in the right way
 

1. What is the energy of the Earth-Moon system?

The energy of the Earth-Moon system refers to the total amount of energy contained within the gravitational interaction between the Earth and the Moon. This includes both the potential energy, which is the energy stored in the gravitational field between the two objects, and the kinetic energy, which is the energy of motion between the Earth and Moon.

2. How is the energy of the Earth-Moon system calculated?

The energy of the Earth-Moon system is calculated using the formula for gravitational potential energy, which is PE = -GmM/r, where G is the gravitational constant, m and M are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them. The kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv^2, where v is the velocity of the objects.

3. What is the significance of the energy of the Earth-Moon system?

The energy of the Earth-Moon system plays a crucial role in maintaining the stability of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. It also affects the tides on Earth and the rotation of the Moon. Understanding and studying this energy can provide insights into the evolution and dynamics of the Earth-Moon system.

4. How does the energy of the Earth-Moon system change over time?

The energy of the Earth-Moon system remains constant over time, as long as there are no external forces acting on it. However, the distance between the Earth and Moon is gradually increasing due to tidal forces, which causes a small decrease in the energy of the system over time.

5. Can the energy of the Earth-Moon system be harnessed for human use?

At the moment, there is no technology that can effectively harness the energy of the Earth-Moon system for human use. However, some studies have explored the potential of utilizing tidal energy from the Moon to generate electricity. This remains a topic of ongoing research and development.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
12
Views
185
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
896
Back
Top