Human Weight, Work and Gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between human weight, work, and gravity, particularly in the context of rock climbing. Heavier individuals, when compared to lighter counterparts with identical muscle and fat proportions, must perform more total physical work due to the increased gravitational force acting on their mass. This results in a higher calorie intake requirement for the heavier person to climb the same vertical distance. However, individual metabolic differences and muscle-to-weight ratios significantly influence performance, indicating that weight alone does not determine climbing efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly gravity and work.
  • Knowledge of human metabolism and energy expenditure during physical activities.
  • Familiarity with muscle physiology and the muscle-to-weight ratio concept.
  • Awareness of climbing techniques and their impact on performance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of work and energy in climbing scenarios.
  • Explore studies on human metabolism and energy expenditure during exercise.
  • Learn about the muscle-to-weight ratio and its implications for athletic performance.
  • Investigate climbing techniques that optimize energy efficiency for different body types.
USEFUL FOR

Climbers, sports scientists, fitness trainers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of weight and performance in physical activities.

agilis1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

My name is Rick and a couple of my friends are having a discussion at a local rock climbing gym about the weight of a person and whether or not a person who is heavier, works harder than someone who is lighter.

Neither one of us are gurus when it comes to physics but would love an answer. I am under the impression that if 2 people, one lighter than the other, who have identical proportions of muscle and fat, the heavier person will be working harder than someone who is lighter when it comes to lifting their own body weight.

I believe the force of gravity acting on the heavier person makes lifting their bodyweight harder.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define "working harder"?

Total calories burned? Calories per unit mass?

(To take it to an absurd degree, it's pretty obvious that a 60ft tall creature would burn more total calories than a 2" tall creature.)
 
To expand a bit on Dave's post:

A physicist might answer:
With the two persons being physiologically and "metabolically" equal except for the differences you mention, then yes, the heavier person will be doing more total physical work, than the lighter person since he has to lift more mass up the same distance. This also means the heavier person must on average have a greater calorie intake to climb the same distance.

A (sports) engineer might add:
However, I believe metabolically differences between persons can make a huge difference. Also, as recent studies have revealed, when tasked with doing the same low-activity work (like resting, sitting) two persons can have vastly different muscular activity. Of course such effect probably have less significance when climbing vertical wall on full power, but it just go to illustrate that there still are individual variations in human metabolism that are not fully understood yet.

An exercise physiologist may add something else, but I'm not qualified to guess what that might be.
 
It really depends on their physique. The heavier person may have a higher muscle/weight ratio or the lighter person might. It really depends on that ratio more than anything else.

EDIT: thinking about it when I go rock climbing I tend to do well because I am light but quite strong. One of my friends who usually comes with me is stronger and a lot heavier (he's very tall) but he always seems to have an easier time than me. Conversely I have another friend who is heavier and has a harder time of it. So to conclude the same thing again, it's not all about weight :P
 
The energy that must be expended to gain gravitational potential energy is mass*9.8*vertical distance (in meters, kilograms).
So a heavier person will use up more energy to climb to the same height.
But probably more important is how physically fit a person is, since most of the energy used by a person climbing is actually wasted (not turned into gravitational potential energy).
 
Wow! Thanks so much for everyone's input. It's really appreciated. I actually understand everyone's response which his hats off to you all :) Ryan's response is the only one that was the odd ball. Ryan, in my example, we were thinking that the ratios were identical but the weight was different.

Again thanks so much and if anyone wants to add anything else I'll be sure to read it and/or respond.

-----

Ryan I wasn't calling you an oddball. Your post just said the opposite than the other replies. I think in your example, your friend, being heavier / stronger may have better technique when climbing than you, so it's easier. Because I don't know you, this is just a guess.
 
Last edited:
no problem, all the best
 
Another interesting thing to think about is this: mass varies cubically with size (taken to mean one length, height, or width) while muscle strength varies according to the cross-sectional area of muslce, as a squared term.

The end result is that people (and animals) who are smaller typically can lift more relative to their mass. This is why ants, for example, can lift ten times their weight. It's actually really not that special.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
28K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K