Humanoid 8 Teats: Benefits & Risks Explored

  • Context: Writing: Input Wanted 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the anatomical and evolutionary implications of humanoids having multiple teats, specifically eight, to accommodate high birth rates, as proposed in the context of the Kepler Bb story. Participants debate the feasibility of growing a third breast post-pregnancy and the evolutionary advantages of such traits. Key anatomical differences of these humanoids include two hearts, increased intracranial space, and supercharged immune cells, which contribute to their unique reproductive and survival strategies. The conversation highlights both the potential benefits of enhanced lactation capabilities and the risks associated with increased offspring numbers, such as the spread of illness and allergies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of humanoid anatomy and evolutionary biology
  • Knowledge of lactation physiology and breast development
  • Familiarity with the concept of social evolution in species
  • Awareness of the Kepler Bb narrative and its anatomical context
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the evolutionary advantages of multiple teats in mammals
  • Explore the physiological changes during pregnancy and lactation
  • Investigate the role of social cooperation in humanoid evolution
  • Examine case studies of humans with supernumerary breasts and their functionality
USEFUL FOR

Writers, evolutionary biologists, and speculative fiction enthusiasts interested in anatomical adaptations and reproductive strategies in humanoid species.

caters
Messages
229
Reaction score
10
My Momma told me that if these humanoids can have up to 12 babies in a single pregnancy that they should have 8 teats like a dog does. However to me, having what is basically a single big breast with 8 teats seems weirder for a humanoid than the ability to grow a 3rd breast. I mean yes it would mean that they can produce a lot more milk before they get full but still it seems weird.

This is why I proposed the growth of a third breast possible after a pregnancy with at least triplets and having a group of lactating women for those who have 5 or more(quadruplets are much easier to nurse than quintuplets).

Now this pretty much means that either the children have to nurse longer(which makes sense with the delay on eating solid food to 9 months instead of 6 months) or the lactating women have to somehow stimulate themselves to produce milk with or without a baby.

But would this actually be beneficial?

I mean on the one hand, there is a lot of food and water for them but on the other hand there is a higher chance of sickness spreading, even with an isolated sick bay. Plus there is a higher chance of one child getting severe allergies and even anaphylaxis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
caters said:
My Momma told me that if these humanoids

Which humanoids? Is this a story you're working on? What is the background? Don't assume we know what you're talking about here.

Cray' pid='23137' dateline='1458490623 said:
can have up to 12 babies in a single pregnancy that they should have 8 teats like a dog does. However to me, having what is basically a single big breast with 8 teats seems weirder for a humanoid than the ability to grow a 3rd breast. I mean yes it would mean that they can produce a lot more milk before they get full but still it seems weird.

During pregnancy existing breasts do undergo changes that prepare them for breastfeeding. They grow, lay down fat and their milk ducts develop. Growing an entirely new breast is a much more complicated beast. In addition (assuming the women you're talking about are humans) breasts only develop along the milk lines which are symmetrical along either side of the body.

caters said:
This is why I proposed the growth of a third breast possible after a pregnancy with at least triplets and having a group of lactating women for those who have 5 or more(quadruplets are much easier to nurse than quintuplets).

Growing a breast after pregnancy is too late, you want already existing breasts to develop during. As for groups that does not seem a likely evolutionary pathway. It requires the evolution of traits encouraging socialisation, co-operation and pregnancies to match up. Simply evolving an additional pair of breasts is far more likely.
 
The humanoids I am talking about are the ones in my Kepler Bb story that have several anatomical differences between them and us humans.

Here are just a few anatomical differences:

2 hearts and circulatory systems(so heart disease doesn't mean death unless it affects both hearts)
Increased intracranial space(this helps increase oxygen transport and fluid balance in a swollen brain)
Supercharged immune cells(this helps them survive any infection and it even helps them survive envenomation and poisoning)

As for extra breasts and symmetry there are some real humans with extra breasts. Most of those extra breasts don't function but there is the rare occasion that the extra breasts do function.

After pregnancy doesn't seem too late to me. I mean, breastfeeding women still produce more estrogen and progesterone than women who aren't pregnant nor breastfeeding and those hormones along with supporting pregnancy and ovulation also help with breast growth.

And wet nurses(who are women that help breastfeed babies) can lactate for 20-30 years without having to become pregnant very often as long as there are babies for them to breastfeed.

Plus humanoid species are very likely to have evolved socialization and co-operation as well as collective learning(where each generation(and I am using it scientifically) knows more than the previous one).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K