Hydraulics Question: Seeking Explanation on Self-Running Machine

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bunion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydraulics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of a self-running machine utilizing a hydraulic system with a quadrant shape, as proposed by a user named Phil on www.overunity.com. Feedback indicates that the concept is fundamentally flawed due to violations of the laws of thermodynamics, which govern energy conservation. Experts emphasize the necessity of conducting real calculations involving forces, work, and efficiency to substantiate any claims. The consensus is that without a solid understanding of physics and proper calculations, the idea remains unviable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the laws of thermodynamics
  • Basic principles of hydraulics
  • Knowledge of force and work calculations
  • Familiarity with efficiency metrics in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the laws of thermodynamics in detail
  • Learn about hydraulic system design and functionality
  • Explore force and work calculations in mechanical engineering
  • Research efficiency metrics and their application in machine design
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, inventors, and students interested in mechanical systems, particularly those exploring concepts in hydraulics and energy conservation.

bunion
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi about 4 months back i posted my idea for a self running machine on www.overunity.com forums. Basically i had this simple idea about trying to manipulate a hydraulic system using a quadrant shape.

Sorry to post this here but I've had little feedback on overunity.com despite over 1000 views and i don't know where else to turn. I've had it explained to me by someone who worked in physics but to be honest i didnt understand the explanation properly so all I am asking is could someone please explain exactly why it won't work without just stating the laws of thermodynamics?

Here is the original message on their forums:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3375.0.html

Thanks
Phil
 
Science news on Phys.org
The intro to your website seems to imply that you know your pursuit is doomed to failure, so I'm not sure what the point is here. In any case, we don't condone or encourage crackpot thinking here, so we don't allow such discussions. I did do a quick once-over of your site and your ideas have the usual crackpot pitfalls: you've created scenarios so complex that you are unable to find the flaws in them. That doesn't mean the flaws don't exist.

Btw, if you ever want anyone to ever even analyze your work for you, you're going to need to do real calculations to support the ideas. Ie, actually calculating forces, work, and real efficiency. "Units" is not a unit. Your calculations are essentially meaningless. Heck - if you learn the real physics it may enable you to find your mistakes faster and convince you to spend your time on a more worthwhile pursuit.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
29K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K