Hydrostatic Equation/Finding depth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spartanlol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Hydrostatic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the hydrostatic equation to determine the depth required to achieve a specific pressure in a fluid, specifically water. The original poster is exploring the relationship between pressure and depth in the context of hydrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the application of the hydrostatic equation and questioning the assumptions regarding the density of water. There is discussion about whether the density can be considered constant and how to interpret the change in pressure relative to atmospheric pressure.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning the original poster's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of pressure changes and the appropriateness of expressing depth as a positive value.

Contextual Notes

There is a hint provided in the discussion that relates altitude or depth with pressure, and participants are navigating the implications of using absolute versus relative pressure in their calculations.

Spartanlol
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
One atmosphere of pressure is equal to 101,325 Pa. If the density of water is 998 kg/m3, what is the necessary depth to reach 2 atm of pressure relative to the surface



Hydrostatic equation: p=-wh where p is change in density, w is specific weight (density*gravity), and h is change in altitude.




Now the hydrostatic equation is p=-wh where p is change in density, w is specific weight, and h is change in altitude. Now, to get w, it is simply w=(998)(9.81)=9790.38. So we now have p=-(9790.38)h. Now it is (101325*2)=-(9790.38)h. Multiply and divide and we get -20.69889014=h.


My question is whether I did this right or not. If I was successful, should I put it as positive 20.698 meters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not think your equation applies. For this problem, the density of water can be considered constant (incompressible fluid assumption).
 
Well, he gave us a hint of: "Hint: what equation relates altitude (or depth) with pressure?"

This equation would make sense. I'm not sure what you mean by the density being a constant. It already is. However, when calculating for pressure you need the specific weight of water which requires gravity times density. Also, from what I was told, 1 atm is 10.3 meters, so this answer should make sense.
 
The answer does make sense. I am just questioning how you got there.
Hydrostatic equation: p=-wh where p is change in density...
So, what was the change in density... of a constant-density fluid?
 
My apologies, I meant p is change in pressure.
 
Then back to your original question, a positive number for "depth" is appropriate. Good work.
 
Well, now that I think about it, wouldn't this answer be wrong? If it is the change in pressure, and we are going down to 2atm, wouldn't it still come out at positive 1atm, since the starting atm is 1? Or do we just count the starting pressure as 0?!
 
what is the necessary depth to reach 2 atm of pressure relative to the surface
They are looking for relative pressure. Surface pressure is your reference.
Prelative = Pabsolute@20.6 - Pabsolute@0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K