Hyperbolic Circle <=> Euclidean Circle.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that the set S={z in H||z-i|=3/5} represents a hyperbolic circle in the context of hyperbolic geometry. The transformation f(z)=(z-i)/(z+i) is utilized to map this hyperbolic circle to a Euclidean circle within the unit disk model of Poincaré. The hyperbolic radius is calculated as r=log((1+3/5)/(1-3/5))=2log(2), with sinh(r/2) determined to be 3/4 and the center w0 identified as i. The approach taken is validated through the isometric properties of the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with the Poincaré disk model
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic distance calculations
  • Basic complex analysis, particularly transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hyperbolic circles in hyperbolic geometry
  • Learn about the Poincaré disk model and its applications
  • Explore hyperbolic distance formulas and their derivations
  • Read "Hyperbolic Geometry" by Jim Anderson for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students studying hyperbolic geometry who seek to understand the relationship between hyperbolic and Euclidean circles.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
I have this question which is rather simple, basically reiterating a general theorem.

Show that S={z in H||z-i|=3/5} is a hyperbolic circle S={w in H| p(w,w0)=r}
for r>0 and find sinh(r/2) and w0.

Now to show that it's hyperbolic is the easy task, I just want to see if I got my calculations correct for sh(r/2) and w0.

Now it's best to move to the unit disk model of poincare by: f(z)=(z-i)/(z+i) because this is an isometry it keeps the same lengths here.
(D={z in C| |z|<1} so f(S)={u in D||f(z)-f(i)|=|(u-0)|=3/5} so it's a unit eulidean circle around zero, now we have the following relationship between this radius and the hyperbolic radius r=log((1+3/5)/(1-3/5))=2log(2) and sh(r/2)=3/4 and to get back w0 we need to use the fact that f(w0)=(w0-i)/(w0+i)=0 thus w0=i.
Is this approach valid?

thanks in advance.
btw, there's a great book from jim anderson from southhampton university on hyperbolic geometry.
In case someone wants a recommendation (for those who want to learn the subject via models and not by the axiomatic method).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K