MHB Hyperreal Intermediate Value Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Value
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) to hyperreal numbers. A participant questions whether the IVT holds for continuous functions defined on hyperreal intervals, specifically when considering closed intervals that may be unbounded. They reference Jerome Keisler's book, which provides a proof of the IVT in the context of hyperreals. The conversation also touches on the limitations of using Los's theorem for proving this property. Overall, the inquiry seeks to clarify the relationship between continuity in hyperreal functions and the IVT.
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I haven't thought too much about this, but it seems to me that the intermediate value theorem would transfer. Am I incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
conscipost said:
I haven't thought too much about this, but it seems to me that the intermediate value theorem would transfer. Am I incorrect?

In Elementary Caculus: An Infinitesimal Approach by Jerome Keisler in chapter 3, there is good proof of this.
The chapters and whole book is a free down-load HERE.
 
Plato said:
In Elementary Caculus: An Infinitesimal Approach by Jerome Keisler in chapter 3, there is good proof of this.
The chapters and whole book is a free down-load HERE.

This was not quite what I was thinking about. But I think it helps clarify the question I had. I have not thought much about the topology of the hyperreals but what I'm asking is:

Say I have a continuous function defined on the hyperreals and I take a "closed" interval [a,b], that is the set of all hyperreals between a and b, where a and b may very well be unlimited, does it follow that for any c: f(a)<c<f(b) there exists an x so that f(x)=c.

The star transform of [a,b] wouldn't give unlimited elements as far I'm looking into it, so I'm afraid this would have to be proven using something other than Los's theorem.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K