MHB Hypotheses Testing: Sample Size <10 & Known Population Mean/Std Dev

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieranf144
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
kieranf144
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm working on something where the sample size is less than 10 and I know the population mean and standard deviation. When using the T test most of the examples I find calculate the standard error from the sample standard deviation but these are cases where the population standard deviation is unknown. Should I be using the population or sample standard deviation to calculate the standard error?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi kieranf144,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I'm curious, if you already know the population mean and variance then why are you sampling? In any case, the standard error is calculated using the sample variance.
 
Thanks. I have a sample that has been treated differently to the population and I'm trying to see if the difference is significant. Do you think that sounds correct?
 
I would try a one sample T test and use the population mean as the benchmark.

In this case the population mean $\mu_0$ and the hypothesised mean from your sample as $\mu_s$ and

$H_0: \mu_s = \mu_0$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top