I dont understand how to find acceleration for the second part

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sneakatone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
18 replies · 2K views
Sneakatone
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
for the first two I used the equation a=v^2/r
but for the second part I don't know what it is asking for or how to approach it. is there an equation that goes with it?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-02-15 at 3.54.44 PM.png
    Screen shot 2013-02-15 at 3.54.44 PM.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 597
Physics news on Phys.org
the 1st two are wrong when I use a=v/r it is also wrong, and I converted km/h to m/s
 
Hi Sneakatone! :smile:

a = v2/r should be correct.

How exactly did you get 74.3 and 197.7 ? :confused:
 
[tex]a= v^2/r[/tex] will give the acceleration due to the motion around the circle. The actual force the pilot experiences will be those plus or minus the weight of the pilot.
 
105.5^2/150=74.2 m/s
172.22^2/150= 197.7 ms
 
erm :redface:

it's not 150 ! :wink:
 
the diameter is 300 so 1/2 of it is 150 , that's where I got it. and then I tried using the whole diameter ans that is not right
 
no, the diameter is 1000 :wink:
 
well sonb , I can't believe I didnt see that thanks!
now that we have that I still don't know how to do the second part.
 
Sneakatone said:
… I still don't know how to do the second part.

you mean the centripetal acceleration at the bottom?

same method :smile:
 
would i use gravity and the magnitude?
 
do you mean the third part? :confused:

yes, you have to take gravity into account
 
Im thinking it would be something like 22.1-(1/2*9.82) because gravity is downward on a horizontal acceleration.?
 
you're doing it again!

where do those figures come from? :cry:
 
the way I am thinkg of it is that the found acceleration which is 22.1 is being acted upon a down ward acceleration of gravity.

how would you do this?
 
(i don't make it exactly 22.1)

where did the 1/2 come from? :confused:

has your professor taught you about rotating frames of reference, and centrifugal force? what do you know about them?

(i'm off to bed now :zzz:)
 
I believe not , i don't even know which equation I should appy
 
I believe not , I ont even know which equaton to apply.
it seems like w^2r is a possibility.
 
(just got up :zzz:)

has your professor taught you about rotating frames of reference, and centrifugal force? what do you know about them?

2r and v2/r are the same, since v = ωr, even when ω isn't constant)