When expressing [itex]exp(\frac{i\sigma\cdot \widehat{n}\phi}{2})[/itex] as a series expansion, why can we make the assumption that [itex](\sigma\cdot \widehat{n})^{2}=I[/itex]?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Someone I asked on campus showed me this and I don't quite understand its implications (partly because I don't quite understand permutation tensors):

[itex]\sigma_{i}n_{i}\sigma_{j}n_{j}=n_{i}n_{j}(\delta_{ij}I+i\epsilon_{ijk}\sigma_{k})=(\widehat{n}\cdot \widehat{n})I+0=I[/itex]

The middle two steps are really foreign to me, but I get the component parts in front and the last part. Could someone explain in further detail why the middle two parts exist?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I need an explanation behind this calculation

Loading...

Similar Threads for need explanation behind |
---|

I Why do we need the position operator? |

I Do we need Quantum Censorship |

I Do we need a reference frame in Quantum Hilbert space? |

A Shor's algorithm - need to uncompute auxiliary qubits? |

B Teacher needs help: Bra–ket notation for parabolas? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**