What Are the Correct Formulas and Units for These Physics Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IKnowGravity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on various physics equations and their correct formulas and units, particularly regarding the force between charges and centrifugal force between rotating masses. There is confusion about whether "r * r" refers to radius or diameter in the equations. The conversation also touches on the mass of light, presenting two formulas involving Planck's constant and frequency, with a debate on whether to modify Planck's constant by dividing it by 2π. Additionally, participants discuss the simulation of charged particles, questioning the correct method for calculating acceleration and trajectory increments over time. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on these physics concepts and their applications.
IKnowGravity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Explanation of what is what in the formula and the unit in which they are in.

The force between two charges.

The centrifugal force between two rotating masses.

The r * r in that equation is it the radie or the diameter? I mean the length.


The mass of light. There are two versions.

Which one is right?

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * c

The Planck konstant can be modified to be divided by 2pi.

Should it? It would seem so if compared by the maximum mass a light photon can have.

mass = h Planck konstant*f frequnsy
----------------------------
c * 2 * pi c


Aslo the formula for an accelerating charge.

Charged partickles with mass are atrakted to each other and I am going to do an computer simulation.
How musch should the accelerating xyz be incremented per time unit?

The smaller time period the smaller increment in their trajektories.

F = something.

A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


X led The acceleration is modified each interval in x and y and z led. +
or minus a ceartain element.
y led
z led

This acceleration x is then added to the x position of the partickle.
This acceleration y is then added to the y position of the partickle.
This acceleration z is then added to the z position of the partickle.

Is this right?

Have i forgotten something. Help is greatly apreciated.

Christopher. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "the maximum mass a light photon can have"...?
And where did u get that:
"A Acceleration = (mass1 +mass2 )*time* q1 * q2
------------------------------
distans between them


"

It looks terribly incorrect.

Daniel.
 
.. and you spelt a whole load of stuff wrong :/.
 
Forget the spelling.It's something secundary.Looks like a mixing with German...And how does he add acceleration with distance...?

Daniel.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
985
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
527
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K