- #1

- 465

- 8

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- A
- Thread starter hokhani
- Start date

- #1

- 465

- 8

- #2

DrClaude

Mentor

- 7,601

- 3,995

Actually, the Pauli principle says that the wave function of two identical fermions must be anti-symmetric with respect to the interchange of the two fermions. This leads to the Pauli exclusion principle, as it is impossible to built an anti-symmetric state if the two fermions are in the same state. Hence, it can be a superposition of eigenstates, so long as that superposition is anti-symmetric.

- #3

- 465

- 8

Thanks. If we consider the superposition as [itex]\phi[/itex], according to your statement the two fermions (disregarding spin) can never settle in [itex]\phi[/itex] because [itex]\phi(1) \phi(2)=\phi(2) \phi(1)[/itex]. Is it right?Hence, it can be a superposition of eigenstates, so long as that superposition is anti-symmetric.

- #4

DrClaude

Mentor

- 7,601

- 3,995

Yes, that state is symmetric, and thus is a valid state for two identical bosons only.Thanks. If we consider the superposition as [itex]\phi[/itex], according to your statement the two fermions (disregarding spin) can never settle in [itex]\phi[/itex] because [itex]\phi(1) \phi(2)=\phi(2) \phi(1)[/itex]. Is it right?

Share: