Identifying matrices as REF, RREF, or neither

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on identifying matrices as Row-Echelon Form (REF), Reduced Row-Echelon Form (RREF), or neither. Matrix A is classified as RREF due to its leading 1 and absence of non-zero entries above or below it. Matrix B is determined to be neither REF nor RREF as it contains no leading entries. Matrix C, despite having only one row, is also classified as RREF since it has a leading 1 with no non-zero entries above or below it. The consensus is that all three matrices cannot be simplified further, confirming their RREF status.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Row-Echelon Form (REF) and Reduced Row-Echelon Form (RREF)
  • Familiarity with matrix representation of linear equations
  • Basic knowledge of matrix operations and simplification
  • Ability to identify leading entries in matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of Row-Echelon Form (REF)
  • Learn about Reduced Row-Echelon Form (RREF) and its applications
  • Practice identifying leading entries in various matrix configurations
  • Explore examples of matrices that are neither REF nor RREF
USEFUL FOR

Students learning linear algebra, educators teaching matrix theory, and anyone seeking to understand matrix classification in mathematical contexts.

crememars
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Thread moved from the technical math forums to the schoolwork forum
TL;DR Summary: we are given a set of coefficient matrices (shown below) and we need to determine whether they are in REF, RREF, or neither.

Hello! I am having a lot of trouble identifying these matrices, and using the criteria checklist is not helping very much. Here is what I am working with:

Matrix A =
0 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 0

*I think this would be RREF. It has a leading 1 with no non-zero entries above or below it. The two zero rows are confusing me a little though.

Matrix B =
0 0
0 0
0 0

*This one has no leading entries at all, so does it automatically classify as neither REF nor RREF?

Matrix C =
0 0 1

*This matrix has only one row. We did not learn much about exceptions in class, but I feel as if matrices consist of at least more than two equations. Therefore, this matrix should be in neither form. If my reasoning is wrong, then I think that this might be RREF, since there is a leading 1 with no non-zero entries below or above it.

I would sincerely appreciate any help with these problems. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crememars said:
*This matrix has only one row. We did not learn much about exceptions in class, but I feel as if matrices consist of at least more than two equations.
A matrix can have as few as one row or as few as one column. A matrix can represent a system of one or more equations, but it does not consist of equations.

How does your book define the terms REF (row-echelon form) and RREF (reduced row-echelon form)?
Since all three matrices you showed can't be simplified further, I would say that all three are RREF.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K