Identifying singularities of f and classifying them

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SALAAH_BEDDIAF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singularities
SALAAH_BEDDIAF
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, just wanting to know if I'm doing this right. [tex]f(z) = \frac{z}{(z^2 + 4) (z^2+1/4)}[/tex]
Singularities of f(z) are when [tex](z^2 + 4), (z^2 + 1/4) = 0[/tex]

In this case, the singularities are [tex]\pm2i , \pm\frac{i}{2}[/tex]

Lets call these singularities [itex]s[/itex] and [itex]s[/itex] is a simple pole if [itex]\lim_{z \to s} \frac{z}{(z^2 + 4) (z^2+1/4)}[/itex] exists.

I got all these singularities to be simple poles, correct or incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple pole is a pole of order one which means it appears in the laurent expansion as [itex](z-z_0)^{-1}[/itex]
For your functions:

[itex] f(z)=\frac{z}{(z+2i)(z-2i)(z+\frac{i}{2})(z-\frac{i}{2})}=\frac{2}{15}[-\frac{1}{z+2i}-\frac{1}{z-2i}+\frac{1}{z+\frac{i}{2}}+\frac{1}{z-\frac{i}{2}}][/itex]

Where I have used the method of partial fractions.
 
Shyan said:
A simple pole is a pole of order one which means it appears in the laurent expansion as [itex](z-z_0)^{-1}[/itex]
For your functions:

[itex] f(z)=\frac{z}{(z+2i)(z-2i)(z+\frac{i}{2})(z-\frac{i}{2})}=\frac{2}{15}[-\frac{1}{z+2i}-\frac{1}{z-2i}+\frac{1}{z+\frac{i}{2}}+\frac{1}{z-\frac{i}{2}}][/itex]

Where I have used the method of partial fractions.

Thanks, but on my course we don't use any sort of expansions so I'm having difficulty understanding what the expansion actually tells me, I just wanted to know if those singularities I have are just simple poles or poles of higher order.
 
Your definition of a simple pole is incorrect. A pole s of f(z) called removable if
[tex]\lim_{z \to s} f(z)[/tex]
exists, and it is a simple pole if
[tex]\lim_{x\to s} (z-s) f(z)[/tex]
exists and is not equal to zero (if it was zero then you would have a removable singularity).

You can easily check by just canceling the numerator and denominator of the simple pole limit that the poles you have are simple
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K