MHB If 1m^2 price is 9.33 $ then what's the price for 1meter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nominj98
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the price for one meter of a tube when the price for one square meter is $9.33. It is clarified that square meters measure area while meters measure length, making the initial question somewhat meaningless. The user seeks to determine the cost of coloring a hollow tube, which has a specific surface area. After calculating the surface area of the tube, it is determined that the price for one meter of the tube is approximately $1.61. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the difference between area and length in pricing.
nominj98
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If 1m^2 price is 9.33 $ then what's the price for 1meter?
-----------------------------------------------------------
1m^2 = 9.33 $
1m = ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cannot be determined because it doesn't make sense ...

$m^2$ is a two-dimensional area; $m$ is one-dimensional length

you can pay \$9.33 for a square meter of carpet, but you can't buy 1 meter of carpet
 
Ohh sorry for my mistake, I forgot to add this picture, Please help me to answer this.
If 1m^2 price is 9.33 $ then what's the price for 1meter?
-----------------------------------------------------------
1m^2 = 9.33 $
1m = ?

1618467672247.png
 
Having been told that a carpet, which covers and area, must be measured in an area measure, like $m^2$, so that you can't buy "1 m" of carpet, and your question is meaningless, why do you ask exactly the same question again?

You have included a picture now, but with no explanation. What is this picture of and what does it have to do with carpets?
 
There is nothing to do with any carpet, This tube which is in this picture has to be coloured, The price for colouring this tube is 1m^2 = 9.33$, I need to find the price for 1m, I know what you mean about "m^2 is a two-dimensional area; m is one-dimensional length", The reason I keep asking is that one guy keeps on asking this answer and I don't know how to get this, this is how I answered but he is telling it is wrong and not giving me the answer, Please help me if you can.

1618492378954.png
 
circumference of a circle = $2\pi$ times the radius, or $\pi$ times the diameter

you seem to want the surface area of a hollow tube one meter in length with an approximate diameter of 50.55 units, which I'm assuming are millimeters ... note your cross-section is close to be circular, but is actually an ellipse.

$A = C \cdot L = \pi \cdot d \cdot L \approx \pi \cdot (0.055 \, m) \cdot (1 \, m) \approx 0.173 \, m^2$

based on that area ...

$\dfrac{\$ 9.33}{1 \, m^2} = \dfrac{\$ x}{0.173 \, m^2} \implies x \approx \$1.61$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
924
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
901
Replies
44
Views
5K
Back
Top