If A and B are Hermitian operators is (i A + B ) Hermitian?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If A and B are Hermitian operators, the expression (i A + B) is not Hermitian. This conclusion is based on the definition of Hermitian operators, which requires that eigenvalues are real and eigenfunctions are orthonormal. The presence of the imaginary unit 'i' in front of operator A disrupts the necessary conditions for Hermiticity, specifically affecting the reality of the eigenvalues. A counterexample can be explored to further illustrate this point, particularly by examining the properties of the conjugate transpose operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
  • Familiarity with the concept of conjugate transpose
  • Basic principles of linear algebra and vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the conjugate transpose operation
  • Study the raising and lowering operators in harmonic oscillators
  • Explore counterexamples to Hermitian conditions in operator theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, mathematicians focusing on linear algebra, and anyone studying operator theory in physics will benefit from this discussion.

Settho
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
OP warned about not using the homework template
If A and B are Hermitian operators is (i A + B ) a Hermitian operator?
(Hint: use the definition of hermiticity used in the vector space where the elements are quadratic integrable functions)

I know an operator is Hermitian if:
- the eigenvalues are real
- the eigenfunction is orthonormal
- the eigenfunctions form a complete basis set.

I know how to prove if A + B is a Hermitian operator, but because of the i in front of A I still am a little bit confused.

So I know to prove if the eigenvalues are real. You have to use these integrals first and prove both sides are the same so that λ = λ*

332up34.png


So I did this:
20qhtar.png


I have doubts about the last one, because I think that is now how it is suppose to go, but I don't know. And then I thought because both sides aren't the same the eigenvalues aren't real and it isn't Hermitian.
io3djr.png


Is this correct? If it isn't how am I suppose to handle this problem?
 

Attachments

  • 332up34.png
    332up34.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 1,543
  • 20qhtar.png
    20qhtar.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 1,386
  • io3djr.png
    io3djr.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 1,285
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always look for a counterexample.
 
Hermitian operators also have the property ##A = A^*##.
 
Settho said:
[...] how am I suppose to handle this problem?
Also trying looking up the properties of the "conjugate transpose" operation on Wikipedia. E.g., what is ##(AB)^* = \;?##
 
A clue: It will be hermitian in the special case where A=0.

One example of this kind of operator are the raising and lowering operators of a harmonic oscillator, where the A and B are multiples of the hermitian position and momentum operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K