If A is singular; solution space of Ax=b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
When A is a singular matrix, the system Ax=0 has infinitely many solutions, indicating that the null space is non-trivial. The system Ax=b can be inconsistent for certain vectors b, as a consistent solution for all b would imply A is invertible. There exists at least one vector b for which Ax=b has infinitely many solutions, but no vector b will yield a unique solution. Determining the nature of the solution space for Ax=b can sometimes be done by inspection, but this becomes complex with larger matrices. Understanding the relationship between the augmented matrix and the coefficient matrix is crucial for analyzing the solution space without Gaussian elimination.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Suppose it is known that A is singular. Then the system Ax=0 has infinitely many solutions by the Invertible Matrix theorem.

I am curious about the system Ax=b, for any column vector b. In general, i.e. for all vectors b, will this system be inconsistent, or will it have infinitely many solutions?

Surely there exists a vector b for which this system is inconsistent. For otherwise, if it were consistent for every vector b, it would necessarily be invertible (again by the IM theorem), but by assumption it is not.

So here are a few questions I have begun to think about, but not fully able to explain:

Given that A is a singular square matrix:

1) Does there necessarily exist a vector b for which Ax=b has infinitely many solutions?
2) Does there necessarily exist a vector b for which Ax=b has a unique solution?
3) If b is a certain column vector, can one determine simply by inspection whether Ax=b is inconsistent, has a unique solution, or has infinitely many solutions?

I would appreciation an answer to these questions. I prefer to do the "proofs" myself, so don't give anything away. Thanks much!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes.
2) No.
3) Yes.
 
3):
"simply" - yes
"by inspection" - try it on a 100 x 100 matrix and see if you still think the answer is still "yes".
 
Think of what happends when Gauss-Jordan elimination is applied to the augmented matrix of the system, and compare with the coefficient matrix. What happends with pivot positions, free variables, etc.?
 
Hey all, I have been able to figure out why the answer to the second question is "No".
Also, I have been able to figure out how you can determine whether the solution set is null or whether it is infinite once the matrix A has been reduced to row-echelon form.

But is it possible to determine the solution space of Ax=b without applying Gaussian elimination?

BiP
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K