If energy cannot be created or destroyed, what is the universe?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the conservation of energy law in the context of the universe's origin, particularly relating to the Big Bang. Participants explore theoretical aspects of energy's existence and its relationship with gravity, as well as the limitations of current understanding regarding the universe's inception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the implications of the conservation of energy law, suggesting that if energy cannot be created or destroyed, it must have always existed, thus supporting the idea that the universe has always existed in some form.
  • Another participant proposes that the positive energy of matter is counterbalanced by the negative energy of gravity, leading to a net energy of zero, which they argue does not violate conservation laws.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the Big Bang Theory does not address the origin of the universe and states that the question of how the universe came into existence cannot be answered with certainty.
  • One participant expresses optimism about future clarifications from ongoing scientific efforts, such as CMB polarization measurements and LIGO.
  • A later reply mentions that conservation of energy may not apply in curved space-time, referencing a discussion on general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the conservation of energy in relation to the universe's origin. There is no consensus on whether energy has always existed or how it relates to the Big Bang.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about energy conservation in different contexts, particularly in curved space-time, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

MathJakob
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
I really hope this isn't another stupid question but I think it's a valid question so i'll ask it.

If the conservation of energy law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, then why did it come into existence when the big bang happened? Could we not assume that the energy that created the big bang is also the universe itself? So basically if the 1st law of thermodynamics is true, does that not state that energy has always existed in one form or another?

So if that second statement is true, we can say that the universe has always existed in one form or another and thus was never created, because it always existed, and if it always existed, that supports the 1st law of thermodyamics?

/confused.
 
Space news on Phys.org
We do not know how the universe came into existence. The Big Bang Theory does NOT deal with the origin of the universe. It simply states that the universe was once in a very hot, very dense state and expanded and cooled from there over time, eventually leading to the universe as we see it today. So your question cannot be answered with any certainty.
 
Hope blooms eternal. We still hold hope some questions will be clarified by CMB polarization measurements, LIGO, JWST and a number of other efforts still underway. We have made remarkable progress over the past decade.
 
MathJakob said:
I really hope this isn't another stupid question but I think it's a valid question so i'll ask it.

If the conservation of energy law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, then why did it come into existence when the big bang happened? Could we not assume that the energy that created the big bang is also the universe itself? So basically if the 1st law of thermodynamics is true, does that not state that energy has always existed in one form or another?

So if that second statement is true, we can say that the universe has always existed in one form or another and thus was never created, because it always existed, and if it always existed, that supports the 1st law of thermodyamics?

/confused.
Conservation of energy doesn't apply in a curved space-time in general. See here for an in-depth discussion:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K