If gears multiply torque then why does a Dyno read less?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancy between calculated torque and dyno readings in automotive performance testing. A chassis dynamometer measures traction force and speed at the tire patch, allowing it to back-calculate engine torque using gear ratios and tire diameter. The calculated torque may differ from the dyno reading due to mechanical losses, which can be accounted for by applying a mechanical efficiency factor (eta) of approximately 0.85. This understanding is crucial for accurately interpreting dyno results and optimizing vehicle performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chassis dynamometers and their measurement principles
  • Familiarity with torque, power, and mechanical efficiency concepts
  • Knowledge of gear ratios and their impact on engine performance
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics as applied to automotive engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Chassis Dynamometer Measurement Techniques" for accurate performance testing
  • Learn about "Mechanical Efficiency in Drivetrains" to understand power losses
  • Explore "Calculating Gear Ratios and Their Effects on Torque" for better performance insights
  • Study "Thermodynamics in Automotive Engineering" to apply theoretical principles practically
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, performance tuners, and anyone involved in vehicle testing and optimization will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with chassis dynamometers and torque calculations.

knight92
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
If the selected gear ratio and final drive ratio multiply the torque and reduce the speed then why does the dyno read less torque?

e.g a car with 200 Nm (@5000 RPM) of torque with a 2nd gear selected (Ratio = 2) and final drive ratio 3.5

200*2*3.5 = 1400 Nm of torque
5000/2/3.5 = 714.3 RPM

Why would the dyno read close to 200 Nm then? is it the corrected torque?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
knight92, you didn't mention it, but it sounds like you are measuring your output on a chassis dynamometer driven by your tires. In that case, the dyno only "knows" two things about your car: the traction force exerted on the dyno rolls (in Newtons, say), and the speed at the tire patch (in meters/sec, say). But if you type your gear ratios into the controller, and the tire diameter, the software in the controller can back-calculate the torque at the engine (assuming some level of friction in the driveline). That may be what it's doing.
 
Randy Beikmann said:
knight92, you didn't mention it, but it sounds like you are measuring your output on a chassis dynamometer driven by your tires. In that case, the dyno only "knows" two things about your car: the traction force exerted on the dyno rolls (in Newtons, say), and the speed at the tire patch (in meters/sec, say). But if you type your gear ratios into the controller, and the tire diameter, the software in the controller can back-calculate the torque at the engine (assuming some level of friction in the driveline). That may be what it's doing.
Thats what I was wondering whether the torque shown is back calculated but then not every car's gear ratios are known so how can someone put a random car on the dyno and know what torque the engine is delivering.
 
knight92, if you don't know the gear ratios, you can use the first law of thermodynamics (or at least the time-derivative of it) by saying "power at the tire patch equals power from the engine." (Of course the engine power must be more, because of the mechanical losses in-between.) So you can write force X velocity = engine torque X engine angular velocity, that is, Ptire = Pengine. The dyno should either read out force (surface force at the tire patch) and velocity, or power at the tire patch (Ptire). You should also be recording engine speed, so at that point it's just engine torque = Ptire/omega, where omega is the engine's angular velocity.
To be more proper, you would multiply the engine power by eta, the combined mechanical efficiency of the driveline and tires, which is somewhere around 0.85. Using that, the engine torque would be Ptire/(omega*0.85), increasing the back-calculated engine torque by about 18%.
Note that without accounting for the mechanical efficiency eta, the engine torque predicted from the power at the tire patch would be less than the engine's actual torque, just as you originally said!
And you're right, the more general way to do this is from a power-balance standpoint. Then you don't have to worry about gear ratios, or even having a torque converter in the system.
 
knight92 said:
Thats what I was wondering whether the torque shown is back calculated but then not every car's gear ratios are known so how can someone put a random car on the dyno and know what torque the engine is delivering.
In the unlikely event you can't find ratio data online, Measure the engine rpm (at the dizzy or via ecu) : engine rpm over dyno rpm gives drive train (gear box and diff) ratio.
You can also calc drive train ratio on the open road from the rpm, speed and wheel radius. Error in your tacho and speedo mean it won't be very accurate through, I'd guess ~5% for an average car.
 
billy_joule said:
In the unlikely event you can't find ratio data online, measure the engine rpm (at the dizzy or via ecu).
or simpler still, simply attach a sensing wire / clamp to one of the spark plug wires (this is done at some dyno shops).
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K