If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodama
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 1K views
kodama
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
145
TL;DR
From Quantum Relative Entropy to the Semiclassical Einstein Equations
the paper in

Physical Review Letters


From Quantum Relative Entropy to the Semiclassical Einstein Equations​

Philipp Dorau* and Albert Much


Abstract​

We provide arguments indicating that the semiclassical Einstein equations follow from quantum relative entropy and its proportionality to an area variation. Using modular theory, we establish that the relative entropy between the vacuum state and coherent excitations of a scalar quantum field on a bifurcate Killing horizon is given by the energy flux across the horizon. Under the assumption of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy-area formula, this energy flux is proportional to a variation in the surface area of the horizon cross section. The semiclassical Einstein equations follow automatically from this identification. Our approach provides a quantum field theoretic generalization of Jacobson’s thermodynamic derivation of the Einstein equations, replacing classical thermodynamic entropy with the well-defined quantum relative (Araki-Uhlmann) entropy. This suggests that quantum information plays a central role in what is often seen as a zeroth order approximation of a theory of quantum gravity, namely quantum field theory in curved spacetimes.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 091602 – Published 2 March, 2026

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/lmq8-nsty

this means gravity isn't a fundamental force

if true what does this means to string theory and loop quantum gravity and other quantum gravity?

are there gravitons in these theories
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
In such a theory there may still be a graviton, but in such a theory it is a collective excitation analogous to a phonon (a quantum of sound), rather than a fundamental particle. Such theories are in spirit very different from loop quantum gravity and string theory, but there is no direct contradiction between them. Loop quantum gravity, and even string theory, may well be good effective theories, rather than the fundamental ones.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kodama
Thank you for posting this. My reading may be incomplete, but I see it primarily as a derivation of the Einstein equations from information-theoretic considerations, rather than a derivation of spacetime itself. The framework seems to start from a setting where local horizons, causal structure and spacetime geometry are already available, and then shows how the Einstein equations can follow from relative entropy under certain assumptions.

For that reason, I would personally view it as evidence that quantum information may underlie gravitational dynamics, rather than as a demonstration that spacetime and gravity are fully emergent.
The origin of spacetime structure itself, and of the cosmological constant, still seem to me to be open questions. But perhaps I am missing something, and these questions are simply beyond the scope of the present paper and left for future work.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and kodama
Demystifier said:
In such a theory there may still be a graviton, but in such a theory it is a collective excitation analogous to a phonon (a quantum of sound), rather than a fundamental particle. Such theories are in spirit very different from loop quantum gravity and string theory, but there is no direct contradiction between them. Loop quantum gravity, and even string theory, may well be good effective theories, rather than the fundamental ones.
Einstein Equations from Quantum Relative Entropy imply that gravity is not fundamental field - perhaps conflict with Deur graviton self interaction and string theorywhich promises gravitons

could loop quantum gravity physicist used Einstein Equations from Quantum Relative Entropy with spinfoam to prove and show how loop quantum gravity gives you semiclassical Einstein equations

similar to Einstein Equations from Quantum Relative Entropy

Physical Review D

Entanglement entropy in loop quantum gravity and geometrical area law​

Muxin Han*


Phys. Rev. D 113, 084045 – Published 20 April, 2026

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/8l48-qhks



Abstract

The nonfactorizing nature of the Hilbert space in loop quantum gravity (LQG) due to gauge invariance requires a generalized definition of entanglement entropy. This work employs the framework of von Neumann algebras to investigate the entanglement entropy in LQG. On a graph, the holonomy and flux operators within a region and on the boundary generate a nonfactor type I von Neumann algebra, which is used to define the entanglement entropy for LQG states. This algebraic formalism is applied to “fixed-area states”—superpositions of spin networks associated with a surface with a definite macroscopic area given by the LQG area spectrum. By maximizing the entropy, we derive a geometrical area law where the entanglement entropy is proportional to the area. In addition, we show that bulk entanglement can renormalize the area-law coefficient and produce logarithmic corrections. The results in this paper closely relate to LQG black hole entropy.

Entanglement entropy in loop quantum gravity and geometrical area law


Muxin Han*

From Quantum Relative Entropy to the Semiclassical Einstein Equations​

Philipp Dorau* and Albert Much

together might show how

Semiclassical Einstein Equations from loop quantum gravity and geometrical area law

 
Last edited:
The derivation assumes the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy-area formula S=A/(4Gℏ)S=A/(4Gℏ), which is itself a semi-classical result. It comes from Hawking 1975 (QFT on curved spacetime plus Einstein equations to fix κκ) combined with the first law of BH mechanics (using the κ/8πGκ/8πG coefficient from Einstein specifically, change the gravitational Lagrangian and it becomes Wald entropy, not A/4GA/4G). So the entropy-area formula already encodes Einstein gravity. Deriving Einstein equations from that assumption is reformulation rather than foundation, and the same structural issue applies to Jacobson 1995, which this paper explicitly builds on.

The paper’s real contribution is a cleaner thermodynamic-style derivation using quantum relative entropy (Araki-Uhlmann) and modular theory instead of classical thermodynamic entropy, technically valuable, but reading it as “gravity is emergent from quantum information” overstates the ontological content, and more of a clickbait title.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kodama