If in Ring, evaluate (a+b)(c+d)

  • Thread starter Thread starter apalmer3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the expression (a+b)(c+d) within the context of ring theory, specifically when a, b, c, and d are elements of a ring R. Participants confirm that the expression simplifies to ac + ad + bc + bd through the distributive property of rings. The conversation highlights that while addition is commutative in rings, this property can be derived from the distributive property rather than being an independent axiom. The participants emphasize the importance of maintaining order in multiplication, particularly in non-commutative rings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and its properties
  • Familiarity with the distributive property in algebra
  • Knowledge of commutative and non-commutative operations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rings, focusing on distributive laws
  • Learn about commutative vs. non-commutative rings
  • Explore advanced algebraic structures such as fields and modules
  • Practice problems involving ring operations and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those in advanced algebra or abstract algebra courses, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to ring theory and its applications.

apalmer3
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a,b,c,d \in R, evaluate (a+b)(c+d). (R is a ring.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think that it's simple foiling, but I'm not sure.
ac+ad+bc+bd
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you suspect this not to be true?

If you're in doubt re-check the definition of a ring.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it simply because I'm in a 4000 level Math course. It can't be this easy an answer.
 
What else could it be?
 
Well, if there's no more information about a,b,c,d than I don't know what else you could do :smile:
 
Okay, so I'm going to guess that everyone agrees with me that this is right? It just seems too easy! Oh well, I'll accept it and move on. :-D
 
Treat (a+d) as one element and use the distributive property of rings. Then use it again. Make sure you keep the ordering if you're not dealing with a commutative ring.
 
Okay, that makes sense, PingPong! So, technically, the order is different.

(a+b)(c+d)
=> (a+b)c+(a+b)d
=> ac+bc+ad+bd
 
Right, but remember that in a ring, addition is commutative, so your order doesn't matter. What I said about ordering was meant to be applied to multiplication (unless you're dealing with a commutative ring). So what you had at the beginning was correct, but now you see why!

EDIT: Actually as a side note, commutativity of addition in a ring is an unneeded axiom, because it follows from the distributive property. If you treat (c+d) as one element, the distributivity property gives (a+b)(c+d)=a(c+d)+b(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd. This means that ac+bc+ad+bd (your method) is equivalent to ac+ad+bc+bd, or ad+bc=bc+ad. Thus addition is commutative.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
983
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K