Showing that an element is a unit in a ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Ring Unit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the ring of integral Hamiltonian quaternions, specifically examining the conditions under which an element is a unit. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that if the norm of a quaternion equals one, then the quaternion is a unit in the ring.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the norm of a quaternion to its conjugate, questioning how to show that the product of the quaternion and its conjugate equals one in both orders. Other participants suggest verifying the properties of the inverse and its membership in the ring.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of the norm condition and the properties of quaternion multiplication. Some have reiterated the need to show the relationship between the quaternion and its conjugate, while others are considering the implications of known inverses.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the definitions and properties of quaternions, particularly regarding their norms and conjugates. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the implications of the ring structure on the properties of units.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let ##S=\{a+bi+cj+dk \mid a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{Z}\}## be the ring of integral Hamiltonian quaternions, where multiplication is defined using the same rules as in ##\mathbb{H}##, the ring of real Hamiltonian quaternions. Define a function $$N:S\to\mathbb{Z}, N(a+bi+cj+dk)=a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2.$$

Show that if ##N(\alpha)=1##, then ##\alpha## is a unit

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So suppose we know that ##N(\alpha) = \alpha\bar{\alpha}##, where the bar is the conjugate of the quaternion. If ##N(\alpha)=1##, then ##\alpha\bar{\alpha} = 1##. So to show that ##\alpha## is a unit, all I need to show is the other direction, that ##\bar{\alpha}\alpha=1##. How can I do this? In groups one implies the other since we have inverses, but this is not the case with rings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you already know the inverse, show that it is in ##S## and that it actually is the inverse.
 
fresh_42 said:
If you already know the inverse, show that it is in ##S## and that it actually is the inverse.
Well all I know is that ##\alpha\bar{\alpha} = 1##. Clearly ##\bar{\alpha}\in S##, so all I need to show that ##\bar{\alpha}\alpha = 1##. But I don't see how to get that
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Well all I know is that ##\alpha\bar{\alpha} = 1##. Clearly ##\bar{\alpha}\in S##, so all I need to show that ##\bar{\alpha}\alpha = 1##. But I don't see how to get that

If ##\alpha=a+bi+cj+dk## and you define ##\bar{\alpha}=a-bi-cj-dk## so that ##\alpha \bar \alpha=a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2##, doesn't that make ##\bar \alpha \alpha=a^2+(-b)^2+(-c)^2+(-d)^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K