If susy were unbroken, should we need a higgs?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Susy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of supersymmetry (SUSY) in relation to the Higgs field and electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB). It establishes that the introduction of auxiliary scalar fields via the Higgs field is not necessary in SUSY, as scalar fields are inherently included in massive vector multiplets. The conversation highlights the challenges of achieving realistic EWSB with an adjoint Higgs and notes that gauge invariant Yukawa couplings for fermion masses are not naturally generated. Furthermore, it concludes that a massless photon cannot arise from a massive vector superfield component.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB)
  • Familiarity with supersymmetry (SUSY) concepts
  • Knowledge of gauge invariance in particle physics
  • Basic principles of scalar fields and vector multiplets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of the Higgs field in particle physics
  • Explore the implications of SUSY on mass generation
  • Study gauge invariant Yukawa couplings in detail
  • Investigate the properties of massive vector superfields
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and researchers interested in the implications of supersymmetry and the Higgs mechanism in electroweak interactions.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
reading the light-heart book of Aitchison, "an informal intro...", we see that the problem with mass terms in the electroweak bosons is not that they spoil gauge invariance, but that they spoil gauge invariance in a way that it is not recovered when their mass goes to zero.

After one has been forced to introduce these auxiliary scalar fields, it seems that they only way to organize them is via the Higgs field.

Now, in susy, the scalar fields are not an extra. They come included, via the susy generators, in any massive vector multiplet. So they natural... do they need to come from a higgs, at all. I mean, it seems that the limit M--->0 works perfectly in this case, just separating the massive multiplet in a massless vector plus a massless chiral.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trying to accomplish realistic EWSB with an adjoint Higgs seems a bit unlikely. There are no gauge invariant Yukawa couplings between the left and right-handed fermions (assuming the usual chiral SU(2)_W charges) so fermion masses don't appear to be generated naturally. To maintain the SUSY of the massive supermultiplet, the scalar field can only couple to the fermions the same way that the gauge bosons do, namely left to left and right to right.

A much bigger problem is that you can never get a massless photon from a component of a massive vector superfield.
 
Last edited:
fzero said:
Trying to accomplish realistic EWSB (...)
Well, of course, to consider SUSY unbroken at EW scale is not a realistic scenary (it is for my own purposals, as I do not believe on fundamentel squarks and sfermions... but in general we can consider it a theoretical exercise) . Similarly, fermion mases are not a requisite in this scenary. One could consider a plus if some mechanism incorporates a mass for the top.

with an adjoint Higgs seems a bit unlikely.
So my first bet was "no higgs at all", but yes, possibly we can consider the winos and their partners as a kind of adjoint higgs.

A much bigger problem is that you can never get a massless photon from a component of a massive vector superfield.

Hmm I had not though on the mixing, damn!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K