A If the solution of a field vanishes on-shell does it mean anything?

Click For Summary
The action S=S(a,b,c) describes a functional relationship among fields a, b, and c, where the solution for field c is expressed as f(a,b). When f(a,b)=0, it indicates that c vanishes on-shell, meaning that c's behavior is entirely determined by fields a and b when they satisfy the equations of motion. This on-shell condition signifies that field c lacks independent dynamics, acting as a constraint on the system. Additionally, such conditions may arise from underlying symmetries or conservation laws within the action S. Overall, the vanishing of field c on-shell reveals important insights into the system's dynamics and symmetries.
Baela
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Let us consider an action ##S=S(a,b,c)## which is a functional of the fields ##a,\, b,\,## and ##c##. The solution of the field ##c## is given by the expression ##f(a,b)##. On taking into account the relations obtained from the solutions for ##a## and ##b##, we find that ##f(a,b)=0##. If the solution for the field ##c## vanishes on-shell, does it mean anything particular?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, the fact that the solution for the field ##c## vanishes on-shell has a specific meaning in this context. It means that when the fields ##a## and ##b## satisfy the equations of motion, the field ##c## automatically satisfies the equation ##f(a,b)=0##. This is known as the on-shell condition for the field ##c##.

Physically, this on-shell condition indicates that the field ##c## does not have any independent dynamics and its behavior is completely determined by the fields ##a## and ##b##. This can be interpreted as a constraint on the dynamics of the system, where the value of ##c## is completely determined by the values of ##a## and ##b## at every point in spacetime.

In some cases, the on-shell condition for a field may also arise due to symmetries or conservation laws in the system. For example, if the action ##S## is invariant under a certain symmetry transformation, then the on-shell condition for the corresponding field would be a consequence of this symmetry.

In summary, the vanishing of the solution for a field on-shell has a significant meaning and can provide insights into the dynamics and symmetries of the system.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
984
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
346
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K