If we take bigger and bigger volumes

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volumes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the holographic principle, which posits that the volume of a sphere (R^3) contains less information than its surface area (R^2), leading to a paradox where information density approaches zero as the radius increases. Participants express skepticism regarding the derivation of this principle, particularly in relation to black holes and the transmission of information via gravity waves and Hawking radiation. The conversation highlights the incompatibility of gravity with the second law of thermodynamics, especially when considering multiple bodies in space and their configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the holographic principle
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and event horizons
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics, particularly the second law
  • Concepts of information theory in the context of physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and implications of the holographic principle
  • Explore the relationship between black holes and information loss, focusing on Hawking radiation
  • Study the second law of thermodynamics in relation to gravitational systems
  • Investigate non-Euclidean spacetimes and their effects on the holographic principle
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the implications of the holographic principle and its relationship with black holes and thermodynamics.

Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
(Holographic principle)

Volume of a sphere is proportional to R^3
However, max amount of information inside is proportional to it's surface, to R^2
So information density is proportional to 1/R

It means that if we take bigger volumes, the content inside appears to be correlated with the outside, so some of the chaos we see inside (and interpret as information) in fact is predetermined by the environment.

It looks logical, but...
What is bugging me, if we take R --> INF, we find that density of information = 0.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Dmitry67 said:
However, max amount of information inside is proportional to it's surface, to R^2

What is the justification for this statement?
 
I'm not saying it's untrue but the derivation they have on wikipedia doesn't hold water.

In the case of the black hole anything that falls across the event horizon has an effect on the horizon as it crosses. Information about that matter is carried away from the black hole as gravity waves and hawking radiation, there is no need to suppose that the information about everything that ever crossed the event horizon is permanently encoded thereon.

In other words everything that crosses the event horizon is happening in 2 dimensions over time, the information about it is radiated away from a 2 dimensional surface over time.

As for the information contained in the matter that initialy collapsees to form the black hole... We don't need a black hole to demonstrate that gravity is incompatible with the 2'nd law of thermodynamics. Imagine 2 rigid bodies floating freely in space. There are twice as many possible configurations of that system then there would be if there were only 1 body. If gravitational attraction causes the 2 bodies to stick together then the 1'st scenario has become the 2'nd.

I admittedly don't have a perfect grasp of the behavior of entropy so if I'm typing nonsense please educate me.
 
Frankly, I don't know how Holographic principle works is non-eucledean spacetimes. Especially, BH
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K