If you can create something like antigravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilosophyofPhysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of creating something akin to antigravity, particularly through mechanisms involving "frequency flux" and other speculative ideas. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, propose new terms, and question the clarity of the concepts presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the clarity of the term "frequency flux" and its implications, suggesting that vague definitions hinder meaningful discussion.
  • Another participant humorously proposes a theoretical framework involving a "Higgs boson inverter" and discusses the implications of a "no-hair theorem," indicating a playful yet speculative approach.
  • A different participant introduces their own concept of "gravifrequentic induction," proposing a relationship between frequency changes and gravitational effects, while expressing uncertainty about the appropriateness of their contributions.
  • Some participants challenge the validity of mixing terms from physics without a solid understanding, suggesting that such combinations lead to confusion rather than coherent theories.
  • One participant suggests the possibility of creating an antigravity effect through angular acceleration, indicating a shift towards more practical applications.
  • Another participant humorously mentions minimizing "delta losses" from a "gravameric flux-capacitor," further contributing to the playful tone of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the clarity and validity of the concepts being discussed. There is no consensus on the feasibility of creating antigravity or the definitions of the terms used, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative ideas that lack empirical verification and relies heavily on undefined terms and concepts, which may limit the ability to engage in a rigorous scientific discourse.

PhilosophyofPhysics
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
I was wondering if you can create something like antigravity with a "frequency flux" changing with respect to time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you are asking about something that has no physical verification yet (meaning it is more speculation than anything else), then it is imperative that you be as as clear as possible in what you are asking. For example, what is "fluxing" through what surface area? And what is defined as "frequency flux"? And since a "frequency" can already be associated with a rate of change in time, what is a "frequency flux changing with respect to time"? This is a double rate of time?

It is almost impossible to address a speculative question when the content is undefined or vague.

Zz.
 
PhilosophyofPhysics said:
I was wondering if you can create something like antigravity with a "frequency flux" changing with respect to time?

I can do that too :-p

Of course. But the problem with the frequency flux changer is that the Higgs boson inverter usually breaks very quickly, which leaves you with a totally displaced unperturbed bubble vacuum quantizer. The no-hair theorem then blows in your face, and as such, gives you a non-compensated singularity in the north-pole plane... :biggrin:

Seriously, do you know what you're saying ?

EDIT: seems Zz was faster, and more serious than I was...
Moral of the story: just placing randomly words in a sentence is a fun game to play...
 
I did not place my words randomly. I was "playing theoretical physicist" and came up with my own law of gravifrequentic induction.

The magnitude of the gmf induced is equal to the rate at which the frequentic flux changes with time.

The Frequency force is to the Gravitational Force as the Magnetic force is to the Electric.

While I'm at it I shall say that I also started to think if the different "frequencies of galaxies" was the cause of the expansion of the universe. Then I also came up with an frequentic energy density equation.

I did not mean to bring up my new theory because I know people like me just can't do this here for usually good reason. I really just wanted to know if there was an already known technique where people are using varying frequencies to create something like antigravity or levitation?
 
PhilosophyofPhysics said:
I did not place my words randomly.
Unfortunately, if you don't know enough physics, putting together physics words in some vague attempt to match physics you don't understand to physics you do understand results in random gibberish to people who do understand the words you're using.

For example :
PhilosophyofPhysics said:
While I'm at it I shall say that I also started to think if the different "frequencies of galaxies" was the cause of the expansion of the universe. Then I also came up with an frequentic energy density equation.
Mixing and matching physics words doesn't a theory make.
 
haha, I had reasons for choosing those names. The equations are in the same form as well known equations, and so I came up with similar names.

like mass current, gravitational potential, gravitational resisitance, gravitational resistivity, gravitational conductivity...

eh, I must stop.
 
hmm...i don't think i will get an answer, but can you create an anti-gravity effect with angular acceleration?
 
Yes. The key is minimizing the delta losses from your gravameric flux-capacitor.
 
:smile: OK, play time's over...

PhilosophyofPhysics said:
eh, I must stop.

Exactly!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K