If Zeus can do anything can he make a stone he cannot lift?

  • Thread starter Thread starter threetheoreom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the philosophical question of whether an omnipotent being, represented by Zeus, can create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it. This inquiry touches on themes of logic, omnipotence, and the nature of existence, with participants exploring the implications of such a scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether creating a stone that Zeus cannot lift falls under the definition of "anything" that he can do.
  • Others suggest that if Zeus creates such a stone, he may still be able to lift it by altering his own strength, raising questions about the nature of omnipotence.
  • A participant argues that the question illustrates the nonsensical aspects of the concept of omnipotence, viewing it as more of a word game than a serious philosophical inquiry.
  • One participant introduces an analogy involving an invisible dragon to discuss the implications of asserting the existence of something that cannot be empirically tested, paralleling it with the question about Zeus and the stone.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the naive notion of omnipotence and seeks clarification on previous statements made in the thread.
  • Some participants speculate on the existence of dragons, suggesting that stories of them may indicate their existence in some form, though this is presented as a personal belief rather than a consensus view.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on the implications of the question regarding Zeus's omnipotence. Some see it as a logical paradox, while others entertain the possibility of Zeus's ability to manipulate his own powers.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the definitions of omnipotence and existence, as well as the implications of hypothetical scenarios. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of the claims made and the philosophical underpinnings of the arguments presented.

threetheoreom
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I came accros this question while reading a bit of Logic and i was wondering what you guys think about. If Zeus can do anything can he make a stone he cannot lift?

Hope its not too trivial.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some things to consider:

Does "making a stone that Zeus cannot lift" fall under the umbrella of "anything"?

Does "Zeus lifting a stone that Zeus cannot lift" fall under the umbrella of "anything"?

Is Zeus required to still satisfy the condition that he can "do anything" after creating such a stone?
 
I think I get it 'do anything' ,'Zeus' are all prepositions that are logically disconnected
 
threetheoreom said:
I came accros this question while reading a bit of Logic and i was wondering what you guys think about. If Zeus can do anything can he make a stone he cannot lift?

Hope its not too trivial.

thanks

Its an old philosophical puzzle, but mostly a word game. It has its uses as a thought experiment, so its not trivial, but mainly it shows how nonsensical the idea of omnipotence is.

On the other hand...

Zeus could indeed create a boulder he couldn't lift, but then when he wants to lift it, he could make himself stronger and lift it... as long as Hera didn't make the boulder even heavier when poor old Zeus wasn't looking.
 
JoeDawg said:
but mainly it shows how nonsensical the idea of omnipotence is.
For the naive notion of omnipoitence.
 
Astronomer and Astrobiologist Carl Sagan made the following analogy about an invisible dragon in his book "The Demon-Haunted World - Science as a candle in the dark", which sums up my points.

A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage"

Suppose I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity!

"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle -- but no dragon.

"Where's the dragon?" you ask.

"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon."

You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints.

"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."

Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire.

"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."

You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.

"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick." And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work.

Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists?[/size]

What does it mean to say that Zeus can or cannot create a stone heavier than he can life?
 
Hurkyl said:
For the naive notion of omnipoitence.

Not sure what you're saying here.
 
JoeDawg said:
Zeus could indeed create a boulder he couldn't lift, but then when he wants to lift it, he could make himself stronger and lift it... as long as Hera didn't make the boulder even heavier when poor old Zeus wasn't looking.

That's damn true. Why not? after all ,he IS the father of the gods., and I doubt that even Hera could do anything(I could be wrong here - I'm not a greek mythology guru/pundit). And as for dragons - I personally believe that the stories themselves are proof they exist. They may not necessarily live in our dimension, but may have gone to another(dragons are known for their magical prowess), when Christianity came across the globe, and people started hunting and killing them, for example, St.George, by branding them the embodiment of Satan.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K