Ignoring positive/negative values with trig substitutions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter process91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration of the function \(\int \sqrt{1+x^2} \, dx\) can be effectively performed using the substitution \(x=\tan\theta\), leading to the transformation into \(\int \sec^3 \theta \, d\theta\). The discussion clarifies that within the interval \(-\frac{\pi}{2} < \theta < \frac{\pi}{2}\), the secant function, \(\sec(\theta)\), remains positive, thus eliminating the need for absolute values in the integral. This highlights the importance of understanding the range of values in trigonometric substitutions to avoid unnecessary complications in integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically \(\tan\) and \(\sec\).
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly trigonometric substitution.
  • Knowledge of the properties of definite and indefinite integrals.
  • Basic comprehension of the unit circle and the behavior of trigonometric functions within specific intervals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of trigonometric substitution in calculus.
  • Learn about the integration of \(\sec^3 \theta\) and its significance in calculus.
  • Explore the implications of the range of trigonometric functions in integration problems.
  • Review advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts and reduction formulas.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integration techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of trigonometric substitutions in integral calculus.

process91
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
If I wanted to integrate [itex]\int \sqrt{1+x^2} dx[/itex], I would let [itex]x=\tan\theta[/itex] , which implies [itex]dx=\sec^2 \theta dx[/itex] so that I would have:

[itex]\int \sqrt{1+x^2} dx = \int \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \theta} \sec \theta d \theta = \int \sqrt{\sec^2 \theta}\sec^2\theta d\theta = \int \sec^3 \theta d \theta[/itex]

It is this last equality that I am questioning. Why is it not [itex]\int |\sec \theta| \sec^2 \theta d \theta[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
process91 said:
If I wanted to integrate [itex]\int \sqrt{1+x^2} dx[/itex], I would let [itex]x=\tan\theta[/itex] , which implies [itex]dx=\sec^2 \theta dx[/itex] so that I would have:

[itex]\int \sqrt{1+x^2} dx = \int \sqrt{1 + \tan^2 \theta} \sec \theta d \theta = \int \sqrt{\sec^2 \theta}\sec^2\theta d\theta = \int \sec^3 \theta d \theta[/itex]

It is this last equality that I am questioning. Why is it not [itex]\int |\sec \theta| \sec^2 \theta d \theta[/itex]?

Any value of x can be gotten by that substitution with -π/2 < θ < π/2. sec(θ) is positive in that domain.
 
Thanks, that does clear it up a lot. So for all trig substitutions, then, there is an implied statement about the range of values which x can take and the corresponding range of values provided by the substitution?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K