I'm 25. How to be a philosopher of physics?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Philethan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the aspirations of a young individual interested in becoming a philosopher of physics, exploring the challenges and pathways to achieving this goal. It encompasses concerns about the academic and career landscape, the relationship between physics and philosophy, and the feasibility of pursuing studies in history and philosophy of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Career-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster expresses a desire to become a philosopher of physics but notes a perceived gap between the fields of philosophy and physics, as indicated by professors.
  • Some participants argue that a deep understanding of physics is essential for being taken seriously in philosophy of physics, suggesting that studying physics is crucial.
  • There are suggestions for the original poster to consider taking philosophy courses alongside physics, although the availability of such courses may be limited.
  • Examples of successful philosophers of physics, such as David Malament, are cited to illustrate that it is possible to transition from physics or mathematics to philosophy without a Ph.D. in physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the job market for philosophers, particularly in philosophy of physics, with some participants noting that breadth in philosophical training may be advantageous for employment prospects.
  • Some participants question the necessity of a Ph.D. in physics, arguing that a solid foundation in physics may suffice if one can articulate ideas effectively in the language of physicists.
  • There are differing views on the academic pathways available, with some noting that not all institutions offer a Ph.D. in physics, and that a Ph.D. in philosophy may be a common route for those with a background in physics.
  • Participants share personal experiences regarding the challenges of being recognized in the field of philosophy compared to physics, emphasizing the difficulty of making a living as a philosopher.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of a strong foundation in physics for aspiring philosophers of physics, but there is no consensus on the necessity of obtaining a Ph.D. in physics. The discussion reflects multiple competing views regarding the academic and career pathways available in philosophy of physics, as well as the job market challenges faced by philosophers.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the availability of relevant courses in Taiwan and the uncertain job market for philosophers, particularly in specialized fields like philosophy of physics. There are also unresolved questions about the best academic route to take and the balance between physics and philosophy in one's education.

Philethan
Messages
34
Reaction score
4
I'm Taiwanese and 25. I'm deeply interested in philosophy of physics since I read "An Introduction to philosophy of physics" written by Marc Lange 3 years ago. I majored in Chemical Engineering in National Taiwan University(NTU) at that time. After graduated, I apply for the department of physics in NTU again and I'm sophomore now.

I discuss my dream about being a philosopher of physics with our professors. They told me there is a huge gap between philosophy and physics. Most of the physicists don't care about any philosopher's opinion unless he or she has a Ph.D. degree in physics (and it's very difficult to get both degrees..). Besides, the career plan of most of the students is a little bit industry-oriented(Just join http://www.tsmc.com). But that's not what I want. I also love history of physics very much. I've read the following books:

"Energy, the Subtle Concept: The Discovery of Feynman’s Blocks from Leibniz to Einstein", Jennifer Coppersmith
"The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development", Ernst Mach
"Forces and Fields", Mary B. Hesse

It's hardly possible to study history and philosophy of physics(HPS) in Taiwan. But, even if I could study HPS aboard, I'm still afraid that whether or not I could find a job in the future. In our department of physics, any kind of history or philosophy of physics course is not included in required class.

Can someone give me some advice? Thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right. Nobody cares about physics philosophers unless they also know a great deal of physics, and have actively done research in physics. So if you want people to take you seriously, the best thing you can do is to study physics. Is it possible for you to also take philosophy courses? I don't think this should be impossibly for you to mix physics and philosophy in university courses. In any case, I feel that in order to talk about the philosophy of a subject, a very deep understanding of the subject would be necessary first.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philethan
micromass said:
Right. Nobody cares about physics philosophers unless they also know a great deal of physics, and have actively done research in physics. So if you want people to take you seriously, the best thing you can do is to study physics. Is it possible for you to also take philosophy courses? I don't think this should be impossibly for you to mix physics and philosophy in university courses. In any case, I feel that in order to talk about the philosophy of a subject, a very deep understanding of the subject would be necessary first.
Thank you so much. In fact, the only one related philosophy course in my university is philosophy of science. And...perhaps, it's also the only one related course in Taiwan. Ok, I'll try to face the music. If I really want to be an influential philosopher of physics, then I must have actively done research in physics. Well, maybe I should become a theoretical physicist first and then study philosophy of physics myself. Thanks...
 
Let's take one example of a philosopher of physics. David Malament has a Bachelors degree in mathematics and a PhD in philosophy. It is clear from his writings (and some personal discussions) that he knows general relativity extremely well. You should check out some of his philosophy writings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Malament
So as you see, it's perfectly possible to get a bachelor in physics or mathematics and then move on to obtain a PhD in philosophy. Just try to self-study some philosophy in the meanwhile.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philethan
micromass said:
Let's take one example of a philosopher of physics. David Malament has a Bachelors degree in mathematics and a PhD in philosophy. It is clear from his writings (and some personal discussions) that he knows general relativity extremely well. You should check out some of his philosophy writings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Malament
So as you see, it's perfectly possible to get a bachelor in physics or mathematics and then move on to obtain a PhD in philosophy. Just try to self-study some philosophy in the meanwhile.
WOW...it's inspiring to see a real person who have done what I want to do in the future. But I'm wondering if it's necessary to get a Ph.D. in physics? Or... maybe I should say that it's unnecessary if I can express my ideas using physicist's language, clear mathematical deduction and philosophical argument.
 
Last edited:
Philethan said:
WOW...it's inspiring to see a real person who have done what I want to do in the future. But I'm wondering if it's necessary to get a Ph.D. in physics? Or... maybe I should say that it's unnecessary if I can express my ideas using physicist's language, clear mathematical deduction and philosophical argument.

Like you see, Malament is a well-respected philosopher who has worked with important physicists. He does not have a PhD in physics but in philosophy. So no, it is not necessary. You do need some minimal amount of scientific training however, so a bachelor in physics seems very necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philethan
Philethan said:
I discuss my dream about being a philosopher of physics

You should look at the job market for philosophers. Even if you do everything right, the odds of being employed to do this are not the greatest. Furthermore, a great many philosophy departments look at breadth when hiring junior faculty. If you only do philosophy of physics, your career path becomes that much harder.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong, Philethan and micromass
Vanadium 50 said:
You should look at the job market for philosophers. Even if you do everything right, the odds of being employed to do this are not the greatest. Furthermore, a great many philosophy departments look at breadth when hiring junior faculty. If you only do philosophy of physics, your career path becomes that much harder.

Here's one such statistics from a few years ago, and I don't believe the bleak outlook for philosophy majors has changed much:

https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Unemployment.Final_.update1.pdf

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philethan
This post seems sort of backwards to me. Not all institutions offer a PhD in Physics. In the US, the PhD in Philosophy is often a route, especially in the past, to a higher degree for somebody already specialized in physics. So, just because someone has a PhD in Philosophy doesn't mean they took the actual philosophy route in prior degrees, it simply may have been the only way to gain a higher degree. One of my Professors has a PhD in Philosophy, but has been involved (still is) in numerous important projects for the last few decades in astronomy.
 
  • #10
Philethan said:
It's hardly possible to study history and philosophy of physics(HPS) in Taiwan. But, even if I could study HPS aboard, I'm still afraid that whether or not I could find a job in the future. In our department of physics, any kind of history or philosophy of physics course is not included in required class.

Can someone give me some advice? Thanks in advance...
What country are you wanting job projections for? I've looked at the normal jobs statistic sites and there weren't any listings, so I checked the American Philosophical Association for ALL jobs in ALL fields of Philosophy and it's very bleak.

http://philjobs.org/

This is a field that you would enter more because you aren't interested in money and are doing it just for enjoyment. If you can afford it and want to do it, that's great.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja and Philethan
  • #11
As others have mentioned earning a living as a philosopher is tough.

Odds are your chances are best to support yourself as a teacher or physicist and write some philosophy books and papers along the way.

I took some philosophy courses in college and have read a lot of books along the way. I may not ever be known or influential on the philosophy side, but I've written a few papers. My most cited papers in atomic physics and brain injury each have over 100 citations. My most cited paper on the philosophy side (epistemology) has about a dozen scholarly citations and maybe 20 more informal citations (blogs, wikipedia, etc.).

Since Newton, the philosophy of physics has been driven more by physicists expressing their philosophies than by philosophers dabbling in physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philethan, Fervent Freyja and Dishsoap

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K