I'm an average physics student. Where to go from here?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concerns of an average physics student contemplating their future in the field. Participants explore the challenges of pursuing a career in physics, alternatives to a physics degree, and the implications of academic performance on future opportunities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses doubt about their potential to become a physicist due to average grades and questions the necessity of passion and focus in the field.
  • Another suggests switching to engineering or computer science as viable alternatives, while also mentioning the possibility of teaching or pursuing a graduate degree in a more marketable field.
  • Some participants argue that a GPA of 3.55 is above average and may not be a barrier to engaging in meaningful physics research, emphasizing curiosity and perseverance over grades.
  • A participant shares their experience of being ahead in physics classes and questions the difficulty of transitioning to an engineering master's program with a physics background.
  • Concerns are raised about the competitiveness of graduate programs and the varying acceptance criteria across institutions, with some sharing personal experiences related to rankings and admissions.
  • One participant reflects on the broader implications of not pursuing a career in physics, suggesting that an interest in the subject can still be valuable regardless of professional outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the importance of GPA and passion in pursuing a career in physics. While some believe that grades are critical, others argue that curiosity and effort are more significant factors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying experiences with academic performance and program acceptance, highlighting the lack of a clear consensus on the implications of GPA for future opportunities in physics or related fields.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for current physics students contemplating their academic and career paths, as well as those considering alternative fields or graduate programs.

  • #31
Hm, can the same be said for physics? That's my passion. I recall being obsessed with making a strategy game once but that passion seems to have faded.

I would do physics because I don't want to do anything else. Or maybe I'm just young and stupid and think I'd do physics because I wouldn't do anything else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Then stick with physics.

The action really is in graduate school anyway and physics will prepare you for many graduate options from IT to Statistics to Engineering - the usual bugbear is the math prerequisites and physics is pretty good for that - nearly as good as a math degree - in fact doing both math and physics is usually dead simple. The difference is math degrees usually require you to do your epsilonics - I say usually - my math degree required it - as IMHO it should - but checked it out recently and they removed the requirement as well as a communication requirement and a second minor or major (I did a second major in CS - but physics was popular also) - you could do nothing but math if you wanted. I thought the professional communication was a crock when I did it but 30 years of work changed my mind - it's critical.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #33
Arsenic&Lace said:
Hm, can the same be said for physics? That's my passion. I recall being obsessed with making a strategy game once but that passion seems to have faded.

I would do physics because I don't want to do anything else. Or maybe I'm just young and stupid and think I'd do physics because I wouldn't do anything else.

If you want to do physics then do physics but I would highly recommend a backup plan. I've posted my story several times on these forums so you can read more about it if you want. Essentially, I did physics/math but was constantly learning programming on the side and it helped me immensely when I was looking for a job. I mostly modeled physical systems in my spare time but I also learned about data structures and OOP either in a class or wrapped into my self-learning. If you know those two things reasonably well then you can get a job in software. Data structures is mostly for the interviews if you know what I mean, lol.
 
  • #34
Can one avoid OOP? I'm not at all fond of it.

It sounds like I'm on the right track then, I'm learning various programming skills and doing decently in my coursework. It's hard for me to see why switching to a different major would have a positive effect on my job outlook. I suppose specializing in electrical engineering might open up certain jobs but it seems like with physics + EEE masters or Phd or physics Phd in solid state I'm in good shape.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K