I'm confused about 1st Kepler's law and the 2 body problem

  • Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,782
137
Hi PF,
According to Kepler's first Law any planet in orbit of the Sun describes an elliptical orbit.
I don't know why I can't go on wikipedia since days. But if I remember well I've seen that when there are 2 bodies like 2 stars for example then the center of mass will remain quiet (since there's no external force) while the 2 bodies would rotate around it.
So I'm confused and don't understand why the motion of a satellite should be an ellipse. Probably due to conservation of angular momentum. But then I don't understand why the 2 bodies are rotating around their barycenter.
Or maybe it's a combination of the 2 situation. I'm all confused. Could you please explain to me what's happening?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Any two-body attractive potential problem is equivalent to that of a single body in a central potential [tex]V(r)[/tex] (i.e. independent of angle [tex]\theta[/tex]). Since the potential is spherically symmetric, angular momentum is conserved. Since the original potential is a function of [tex]\frac{1}{r_c^2}[/tex] (where [tex]r_c[/tex] denotes the distance between the centers of mass of the two bodies), all radially bounded trajectories are ellipses. The analysis is quite lengthy and can be found in Goldstein's Classical Mechanics. I think even Landau's Mechanics has a derivation.

EDIT: Ah crap, I messed up my TeX. I'll fix it asap.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,782
137
Thank you covariance. I didn't study this stuff yet and I'll do that in my 3rd year.
If I understood well the 2 bodies are rotating around their center of mass and it's equivalent to say that one of them has an elliptical orbit around the other body.
EDIT : I could enter in wikipedia. Now I visualize it, it's true! I mean if one chose as origin a body then the other body seems to orbit elliptically. While in fact both bodies are rotating around the barycenter of the 2 bodies. Very nice indeed.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on I'm confused about 1st Kepler's law and the 2 body problem

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
532
Replies
2
Views
619
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
760
Replies
2
Views
759
A
Replies
16
Views
495
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
820
2
Replies
29
Views
11K
Top