I'm not sure this is a good idea

  • Thread starter Thread starter badamann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations and challenges of pursuing a career with NASA, particularly in the context of aspirations to become an astronaut versus other roles within the agency. Participants explore various educational paths, career options, and the nature of NASA's operations, including the involvement of external institutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the viability of a NASA career, noting that while it was a childhood dream, they are now reconsidering their options.
  • Another participant suggests that aspiring astronauts typically need to work through the Air Force and highlights alternative paths in instrument design at institutions like U of A Tucson.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the diverse backgrounds of NASA employees, suggesting that focusing solely on working for NASA may limit opportunities, as many similar roles exist elsewhere.
  • One participant clarifies their current academic focus in engineering physics, math, computer science, and chemistry, indicating a broader interest in science rather than a singular goal of becoming an astronaut.
  • Concerns are raised about the narrow criteria of wanting to work specifically with NASA, with a reminder that many NASA projects are managed by external institutions and contractors.
  • Another participant elaborates on the contracting nature of NASA's work, explaining that much of the technical work, including spacecraft design, is outsourced, and emphasizes the benefits of direct employment with NASA.
  • Suggestions are made for pursuing internships at NASA or its contractors as a way to gain relevant experience.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the term "FFRDC," with a participant expressing interest in cooperative education opportunities at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and desirability of a career with NASA, with no clear consensus on the best path forward. Some emphasize the importance of considering alternative options and the nature of NASA's employment structure, while others focus on the aspirational aspects of working for the agency.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of career paths related to NASA, including the distinction between direct employment and contractor roles, as well as the various educational backgrounds that can lead to opportunities in the field.

badamann
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My childhood dream was to work for NASA. I was fascinated with being an astronaut and such, you know? Now that I'm starting college and I'm fumbling potential career options in my head, I'm trying to weigh whether or not a NASA career would be a solid choice. I've heard people say that it's not a very wise choice, but none of the arguments have seemed too convincing. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to fly, you probably have to work your way up through the Air Force and get accepted by NASA (not a lot of openings there). If you want to design instruments that can advance our knowledge, you have other options. You could attend U of A Tucson, and perhaps have a hand in instrument design/application. U of A staff and students figure and polish so pretty impressive (large) mirrors and design and build instruments.
 
Well, check out the education/career background of many of the Astronauts to get a better idea of what it would take to become one. If your sights are just set on "working for NASA" then you have more options available to you. Many engineers, physicists, astronomers, and chemists get jobs working for the agency.

I don't think you should set yourself on working for "NASA" when there are many other similar places that you could work doing similar things. So, in a broad sense, if you want to be a scientist, the outlook is probably pretty good that it is an obtainable goal.
 
Sorry, I guess I wasn't very specific. I'm not entirely positive what I want to do as far as a career, but I do know that it will be science related. My majors are engineering physics, math and computer science, and chemistry, so I'm sure I'll have plenty of options available. Becoming an astronaut isn't so much my goal now as it was when I was younger. I still love the idea of NASA and space exploration, but I'm not sure where or how I'd fit in. Sorry if this topic is all over the place!
 
It is difficult enough to get to work in a particular field, or career. You now are imposing an even narrower criteria of wanting to work specifically with NASA.

Furthermore, I don't think you are aware of the fact that many of the NASA projects and missions are administered by other institutions, agencies, etc. In other words, these people are NOT NASA employees. Who do you think built many of the spacecraft s that has been sent out?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
It is difficult enough to get to work in a particular field, or career. You now are imposing an even narrower criteria of wanting to work specifically with NASA.

Furthermore, I don't think you are aware of the fact that many of the NASA projects and missions are administered by other institutions, agencies, etc. In other words, these people are NOT NASA employees. Who do you think built many of the spacecraft s that has been sent out?

Zz.

No, I did not know that many of the NASA projects are administered by other institutions. I'm always looking to be enlightened and find the best in everything, so could you tell me about or link me to information pertaining to these different institutions. Again, it was just a dream I grew up with as a kid. I'm sure there's a multitude of better and more sound options, but I need to find them first.
 
badamann said:
No, I did not know that many of the NASA projects are administered by other institutions.
NASA doesn't build rockets. They contract that work out. For the most part, NASA doesn't build satellites or payloads, either. Instead it's contracted out. Experiment design? The bulk of operations? A lot of the other technical work? Contracted out. Strictly speaking, even JPL is not NASA. They are a FFRDC that is owned and operated by Cal Tech. There are upsides of working directly for NASA. It is the civil servants who set priority, get to say what (and to some extent how) work will get done, and get to work on the cooler research projects.

You're still in college. If you want to work for NASA, directly or indirectly, consider a summer internship at either NASA or one of their contractors. Another option is to work on a university-sponsored NASA project. Many schools have these now.
 
That about sums it up for me. Thanks a lot!
 
D H said:
Strictly speaking, even JPL is not NASA. They are a FFRDC that is owned and operated by Cal Tech.

Actually... What do you mean by FFRDC? I've been looking into Cooperative education through my university and the jet propulsion laboratory.
 
  • #10
badamann said:
Actually... What do you mean by FFRDC?
Federally Funded Research and Development Center. Here's the master list of all FFRDCs: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05306/ . They can be a nice place to work. You'll need a clearance for most, but not for JPL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K