I'm trying to explain some physics principles to a general audience

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the principles of coherence and alignment in physics, particularly in relation to magnetism, superconductivity, and laser light. The term "coherence" is suggested as a unifying concept, but it is clarified that phenomena like superconductivity are distinct and involve quantum mechanics, specifically the Meissner effect. The discussion emphasizes that all materials exhibit some degree of magnetism due to the presence of electrons, which have dipole moments that can align to create magnetic properties. The BCS theory of superconductivity is referenced as a key framework for understanding these phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron dipole moments and their role in magnetism
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics, particularly superconductivity
  • Knowledge of the Meissner effect in superconductors
  • Basic concepts of coherence in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the BCS theory of superconductivity for deeper insights
  • Explore the Meissner effect and its implications in superconductivity
  • Study the relationship between coherence and laser light production
  • Investigate the microscopic origins of magnetism in materials
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and enthusiasts in physics, particularly those interested in magnetism, superconductivity, and the principles of coherence in physical systems.

sci-guy
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to explain some physics principles to a general audience and have a few related questions:

1) What's the name of the principle that distinguishes between randomly arranged particles in an iron bar and those arranged so as to magnetize it? Is it 'coherence' or something else?

2) Is it the same principle (in a general sense, e.g. 'coherence') that produces phenomena like laser light, superconductivity, superfluidity, etc.? If not (or even if it is), are there other common examples of the same phenomena?

3) Is it correct to say that the particles/waves in these coherent systems "take on field properties"? If not, what's a better way to describe the macroscopic effects.

I'm not looking for long technical answers; brief general explanations will do (hopefully, that's possible for such phenomena).

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


(1) A simple explanation is that the more completely the electron dipole moments are aligned in a material the more "magnetic" we consider a material. You could characteriize an electron dipole moment as the rough equivalent of the north and south pole of the Earth with it's external magnetic field: an electron also has north and south poles as a result of its "spin"...rotation. The electron cloud is the analogy of the earth...

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_material#Microscopic_origin_of_magnetism

and lots of related discussions via links. But be sure to make the point that ALL materials are magnetic to some degree since all contain electrons. Electrons are loosely bound in atoms unlike neutrons and protons in the nucleus.

(2)
superconductivity is a quantum mechanical phenomenon. It is also characterized by a phenomenon called the Meissner effect, the ejection of any sufficiently weak magnetic field from the interior of the superconductor as it transitions into the superconducting state.

superconductivity and superfluidity are closely related:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity#Theories_of_superconductivity

Sounds like you are aware of the BCS theory of superconductivity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity#Theories_of_superconductivity

When I briefy studied BCS, hightemp superconducivity wasn't even known...
More here, I'll leave it to others to tackle as I'm unsure just how well we we really understand superconductivity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginzburg-Landau_theory
 


Thanks -- guess I was looking for a single, simple term like "in phase" or exhibiting "coherence," but maybe there isn't one. Seems like all these phenomena (magnetism, laser light, superconductivity, etc.) share a common feature of aligned structure. Thought there was a single priniciple to explain it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K