Impedance change in matter from ionizing radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of measuring impedance changes in biological tissues when exposed to ionizing radiation. The bio-impedance technique is noted for monitoring organ-related qualities, with shifts in metabolism reflected as changes in impedance. The inquiry suggests that exposing a target volume to ionizing radiation could release electrons, potentially affecting impedance measurements through an alternating voltage field. However, participants argue that the natural abundance of free electrons and ions in biological tissues, which are primarily composed of water and salts, renders the expected changes from radiation negligible. They emphasize that while impedance changes could be measurable in environments devoid of free ions, the practical application in living organisms is limited due to the high background of existing ions. Concerns are also raised about the ethical implications and potential harm of exposing living subjects to ionizing radiation for such measurements.
Janlindstrom
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
bio-impedance technique for measurements of impedance changes induced by ionizing radiation. Is it possible?
Bio-impedance technique is used to monitor various organ related qualities. Shift in metabolism will also show up as a shift in impedance. My question is if by exposing a target volume with ionizing radiation and thereby release electrons and at the same time measure the impedance (which will "collect" the released electrons by introducing alternating voltage field lines?), would that impedance measurement show a change in impedance? Why / Why not?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Janlindstrom said:
... measurements of impedance changes induced by ionizing radiation. Is it possible?
I think within any practical range of radiation it's not possible. Usually, living organs has plenty of 'free' electrons ions around, since they are practically salted water with some 'dirt' in it. The usual contribution of radiation is not much.

The natural ion content in (clean) water is in the 10^18 range (in a kg of water), if I recall correctly.
For potassium in meat it's around 100 decays every second in every kg. In this environment as additional charge, it's just negligible.

In an environment where there are no free ions around, it definitely can be measured (many instruments depends on this).
 
I was referring to the potential impedance change due to impinging ionising radiation i.e x rays. By applying a potential over the volume of interest the free electrons or ions should move according to the field lines in much the same manner as in an ion chamber?
 
Janlindstrom said:
My question is if by exposing a target volume with ionizing radiation and thereby release electrons and at the same time measure the impedance
It seems like exposing a living subject to this level of ionizing radiation would be a very bad thing. What is your endgame? Do you have links to papers about this experiment?
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top