MHB Implied accuracy in scientific notation

bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
i just want to understand what i read in my algebra book. here what it says:

a measurement of 83200 ft. converted to (8.32)x10^4 ft. is now accurate to the nearest hundred feet. if we write (8.320)x10^4 the measurement is now accurate to the nearest ten feet.

i want to know why it is nearest to a hundred feet in the first conversion and nearest to ten feet in the second.

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: need help in my algebra!

It may help to force the mantissa (the number which is multiplied by a power of ten) to be an integer:

$$8.32\,\times\,10^4\text{ ft}=832\,\times\,10^2\text{ ft}$$

We see we have a multiple of 100 ft.

$$8.320\,\times\,10^4\text{ ft}=8320\,\times\,10\text{ ft}$$

We see we have a multiple of 10 ft.
 
Re: need help in my algebra!

thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top