MHB Implied accuracy in scientific notation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies how scientific notation indicates measurement accuracy. The conversion of 83200 ft to (8.32)x10^4 ft implies accuracy to the nearest hundred feet, as the mantissa is a multiple of 100. In contrast, (8.320)x10^4 ft suggests accuracy to the nearest ten feet, since the mantissa is a multiple of 10. This distinction arises from the number of significant figures in the mantissa, which directly affects the precision of the measurement. Understanding this relationship helps in interpreting scientific notation accurately.
bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
i just want to understand what i read in my algebra book. here what it says:

a measurement of 83200 ft. converted to (8.32)x10^4 ft. is now accurate to the nearest hundred feet. if we write (8.320)x10^4 the measurement is now accurate to the nearest ten feet.

i want to know why it is nearest to a hundred feet in the first conversion and nearest to ten feet in the second.

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: need help in my algebra!

It may help to force the mantissa (the number which is multiplied by a power of ten) to be an integer:

$$8.32\,\times\,10^4\text{ ft}=832\,\times\,10^2\text{ ft}$$

We see we have a multiple of 100 ft.

$$8.320\,\times\,10^4\text{ ft}=8320\,\times\,10\text{ ft}$$

We see we have a multiple of 10 ft.
 
Re: need help in my algebra!

thanks!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top