Importance of research experience matching with Interests

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 3K views
dsdsuster
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I thought about what I wanted to ask and decided to rewrite my question more concisely.

Has anyone had any experience with an applicant to physics grad school, who applied in a field almost totally unrelated to his undergrad research? Particularly, in applying to high-end schools? Any advice for a person in this position?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Graduate admissions committees know that students:
- don't always have the opportunity to do research in their desired field
- may not have decided which field to pursue before committing to a research project
- may take on a research project simply out of interest
- may have multiple interests
- may have changed their minds about their academic interested as they progressed through a project
- etc.

Of course it can be an advantage to have worked on a project in something that you want to pursue. Your supervisor (who would presumably be writing the reference letter) may be well-known in that field. You will likely be better versed in that sub-field than other incoming students. You may have demonstrable evidence of success in that field in terms of a published paper or two. But NOT having all of these does not put you at a disadvantage.

And at the end of the day your experience is what your experience is. If you're not in a position to change it, then there really isn't any sense in worrying about it anyway.